Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade KB for a first next year?


t96

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You people drastically underestimate he value and talent of KB. Even captain said he was the only WR they were concerned with. He's a matchup nightmare and he's not the first talented young player to struggle with weight discipline. Trading him would be stupid. You guys act like he hasn't been productive he's been putting up numbers even the so called down year of last season. 

This. I want him here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

I'd trade him to the 49ers for Tartt. Player for player. We need a young safety with talent to groom. 49ers could use a possession guy. Plus Tartt played with Bradberry in the secondary at Samford.

Was going to suggest the same but that's not an even trade.  Tartt and their 4th to give us a pick in all 7 rounds, at a minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Just a thought that popped into my head in response to Jeremy's article about KB being done here. If he truly may be done here past next year then why not try to trade him now? Let the offense get a jumpstart without him and have continuity for going forward. Don't know if we could get a first, but if we could would you trade him for one? What about a 2nd from a rebuilding team who'll likely be picking early? 

 

Personally, I'm not ready to give up on him at all and hope we pick up his 5th year option and keep him, but it does seem like a possibility the team is getting tired of some of his sh*t going on. I mean, the TC before he got hurt he was looking like a Dez Bryant or AJ Green type of dominating player, and that was going up against Norman. I still feel he can get to that level here and while yes the offense seemed better without him, I don't think that means we can't make the offense work even better with him as well. 

 

 

Thats a silly question. In short, of course. Doubt anyone would offer that much for a often injured and overweight wideout. At least from the outside it appears as if he has a lack of motivation. Never good for an athlete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would and I'm a fan--

and I am impressed by Kelvin-- his first 2 seasons for me were a success-- I saw another report of 7 pounds over weight so that's no biggie-- 

 For me when I see a guy put out when it matters but not put out when he thinks it doesn't matter that's my only issue with him.

 He catches when it's going to be a good highlight, makes us all go  wow, but then drops the most  boring passes and when he thinks no one cares. 

 Just my impression, I want him to be awesome and I was one that was jumping up and down we drafted him, And I'm still a fan, I just want him to treat every play like it's huge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You people drastically underestimate he value and talent of KB. Even captain said he was the only WR they were concerned with. He's a matchup nightmare and he's not the first talented young player to struggle with weight discipline. Trading him would be stupid. You guys act like he hasn't been productive he's been putting up numbers even the so called down year of last season. 

It is insane how you are literally the contrarian to everything on this forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

You people drastically underestimate he value and talent of KB. Even captain said he was the only WR they were concerned with. He's a matchup nightmare and he's not the first talented young player to struggle with weight discipline. Trading him would be stupid. You guys act like he hasn't been productive he's been putting up numbers even the so called down year of last season. 

At some point with every single player in the league, the value of a trade becomes too good to pass up. I wouldn't want to trade KB either as I alluded to, but for a first I'd think about it. Throw in a 3rd and I think I'd have to do it. Also need to consider that after this season he becomes much more expensive, on 5th year option or with what he'd command on open market. But if we truly are getting fed up with him then getting something for him now rather than letting him go in FA is a better choice. Especially if we want to build the offense without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, panther4life said:

No I wouldn't. Is anyone really ok with Funchess being the number 1 WR? 

I'd rather do the opposite and trade a pick for a good proven receiver.

Won't need to trade.  Decker will be cut and available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have never had a serious injury before like an ACL, you have no idea what it's like to come back from. Mine still swells and bothers me and it happened 6 years ago. Does KB need to get his weight under control, yes but I'd rather have him here than give up on him after 2 years of playing. The additions we added are only gonna give him more opportunities. Lets see how he does with other actual offensive threats on the field first.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Clipper said:

I'm not sure we were watching the same two players. Brandin Cooks was a much better player than KB last year.

Cooks wasn't coming off an ACL tear, and had Drew Brees in a Sean Payton offense. KB still showed effects of the injury and had a struggling Cam because of poor OL play in a Mike Shula offense...

 

KB has the upside of an AJ Green or Dez Bryant, and showed it just before he got hurt. Had a spectacular rookie year and although struggled with consistency last year also showed quite a bit of dominance. With another year removed from the injury, he'll get even better. I don't understand the KB criticism here. The weight thing is a small concern but really, not a big deal at all. Some of the laziness bothers me and seemingly the team, but another thing that can be dealt with. His ability on the field to be an elite receiver can't be ignored. Of course he still has to put it all together again, but he has the ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...