Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Tre Boston story will give you goosebumps!


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Darth Biscuit said:

I'm not "hating" on it... but I will provide my opinion.  If you want to base a life changing decision on a random encounter with some guy at a gas station, I will not judge you for it. 

I personally would not do that and think it's a dangerous way to live.  In general however, Boston is more set financially than pretty much anyone on this board will ever be so if he wants to let some random dude decide whether he makes millions in Buffalo or LA, then... ok.

Imagine applying that to our lives? Have a job offer from two different companies. Go home to discuss it with wife and family.

 

Wife: We should discuss this.

You: No need honey.

Wife: Why?

You: Well one is in the northern part of the state and the other is in the southern part. On my way home I saw a guy who looked just like Tim Allen. Tim Allen was in the Santa Clause which is my favorite movie and Santa is from the north pole. So I saw that as a sign to choose the company in the north.

Wife. -_ -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To paraphrase Milan Kundera, man is so in love with the idea of fate that we fail to notice all the other many coincidences in life that do not connect to our romantic idea of ourselves and what we value with meaning.

The chargers are a good team in a good state. He has a better chance of playing time. He's just a self-important goofball like the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I have no ill will toward Tre and I wish him well.

As to the story, if all other things were equal in his mind, then I don't see a problem with him making his decision this way.

If all things are equal, yes. But all things are rarely equal, only similar. Chance encounters should not be used to direct your life. That's letting your emotions make decisions for you. Your emotions will get you in places you can't get out of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

If all things are equal, yes. But all things are rarely equal, only similar. Chance encounters should not be used to direct your life. That's letting your emotions make decisions for you. Your emotions will get you in places you can't get out of. 

Would it have been better if he had flipped a coin?

There are times when all factors are equal in someone's mind. In cases like that, someone may choose to look elsewhere.

tumblr_kp1xi3s7z81qzczc7o1_500.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Would it have been better if he had flipped a coin?

There are times when all factors are equal in someone's mind. In cases like that, someone may choose to look elsewhere.

tumblr_kp1xi3s7z81qzczc7o1_500.jpg

 

 

It would have been less dramatic but just as reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...