Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you want Neg Rep back?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

There is just too much immature and downright juvenile behavior in the Huddle for neg rep to be a tool of righteous moderation. It will mostly be a means to have some "get-back," regardless whether the post is truly deserving of some form of censoring or not. Moreover, neg rep will not be about posts, but posters---the people receiving it, and the people gratuitously doling it out.

There is a reason that you got rid of it in the first place, Jeremy. Some things are best left in the past. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bronn said:

I still kinda think the 100 posts to start a thread thing is kinda lame too. There might be good people out there ready to start a thread with insider info, but they can't until they post 100 times? I mean, for people like a bwood alt that isn't a problem... but for someone who lurks here for years? lol

Well you also have spam bots to worry about, so the rule is kind of needed to counter those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Well you also have spam bots to worry about, so the rule is kind of needed to counter those.

true... but don't you think they could drop it down to like 10 and still get the same result?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Na, if you don't like a post, just click a button that says slap or something.  So it doesn't hurt rep.  

But, it will show who's liked and disliked the comment.  Mostly this way because people abuse the negative rep button.    

Yeah I agree. This place can get pretty volatile so neg rep would surely be abused. You could counter pie with something gross, like chard perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...