Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney for Morrison's Old Job


CarolinaADR

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Ron Rivera will be expanding his power  could be Belichick situation  

This would literally be the one of the worst decisions in the history of football.  His evaluation skill is his week point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like Hurney as a GM. I do like Hurney as a person. I think he would actually be great in Morrison's old role. 

 

But I said this before Hurney was even hired. Don't sleep on Hurney being a candidate for the GM job and don't sleep on Jerry Richardson making an asinine decision to hire him. 

Won't feel good about this whole situation until the ink is dry on a new GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Popsickle said:

God I hope not, RR has not shown himself to be a competent coach consistently.  He does not need additional responsibilities. 

Pssssst... Pop?  After reading any sanjay post, I highly recommend one of these:

maxresdefault.jpg

For your own sanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

It has been speculated, but nothing concrete points that way. 

 

We do know that Hurney wants the GM job. That is what he enjoys. 

 

I don't think he would be quite so happy managing the front office types. 

we also know that anybody that wants the panthers to win and has a brain doesn't want hurney anywhere near the GM job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

we also know that anybody that wants the panthers to win and has a brain doesn't want hurney anywhere near the GM job

But what if I LOVE certain vets on the team, and want them extended no matter what the cap implications, and don't care about the bottom half of the roster, nor understand how to actually scout players into certain schemes?

Can I want Hurney then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney is in a unique situation. Maybe he has had time to grow and reflect on what lead to his ultimate failure as our GM. How many people get the chance to leave a job, take multiple years off away from the NFL, then step back into the exact same position you were fired from? I can't think of this ever happening before....maybe, hopefully Hurney has learned from his past failures.

 

Or maybe he's about to sign Greg Olsen to a 6 year 87 million dollar extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

But what if I LOVE certain vets on the team, and want them extended no matter what the cap implications, and don't care about the bottom half of the roster, nor understand how to actually scout players into certain schemes?

Can I want Hurney then?

yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...