Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Love for vets and making the hard decision


yasuhara2241

Recommended Posts

I know that right now everybody is getting on Hurney with a lot of good reason, but my question is about Rivera. He will always trust vets over unproven players and usually he does this for a year or two longer than he should have. I know that Hurney listens to Ron, but how much of this is on Ron? Why play any vets in the preseason if they are guaranteed roster spots no matter what? 

QB: DA was outplayed by Webb and Gilbert. So we keep DA, cut Webb and add a rookie QB? TBH I don't mind the addition of Kaaya, but what has DA done to guarantee a roster spot? He played horrible last year in spot duty and looked even worse this preseason. 

RB: We kept 4 RBs and 0 FBs. There is no way we are keeping 4 active come game day. Make the decision and move on. IMO CAP has shown himself as a great backup to Stew and Fozzy is the backup to CMC. Only difference is Stew has injury history so I would go with CAP over Fozzy and save an extra position. 

FB: Armah showed real promise whenever he played. Def should be on the 53

DT: Keeping Love over Crume. I know Love has always been solid, but Crume had a really good preseason but that wasn't good enough to beat out a guy who couldn't get on the field. 

K: 2? Really? Just cut Gano and move on. Put confidence in whatever kicker you choose. We really punked out on this move. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and inconsistencies showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and incinsistency showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

I don;t know how to post gifs but if I did it would be a standing ovation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think everyone has a valid point about the kickers. I assumed we've kept one for an impending trade. 

I wouldn't say that Love is done, and I can totally understand why Crume was sent back to the PS.

I don't understand why everyone is so bent out of shape over Armah. He was a long shot to make the team to begin with, and he simply isn't ready to be a consistent pro at the position. We may be evolving away from the position, and even if we aren't, Stew plays like a FB better than most FBs.

Fozzy and Cap play a different role in the offense (and special teams really). They are both good at what they do as far as backing up the functions that CMC and Stew do respectively, although both arguably do it at lesser roles. The running game (and passing game within the running game) has played and will play a central role within this offense, so keeping the dynamic going as best you can is paramount to our success.

I told y'all weeks ago that Webb wasn't ready to truly back a starting QB. He has always been shaky, and that's against second and third stringers. The more he played, the more his ineptitude and incinsistency showed. Webb is an infinitely scarier proposition backing up Cam than Anderson, and one decidedly terrible preseason didn't change that fact, at least for me. At least Anderson has experience playing against ones, if not beating them. 

I don't have any big problems with what was done on cut day, although the kicker thing is somewhat of a head scratcher---maybe even a harbinger of confusion and indecision. I'm not absolutely sure it's a vet vs rookie thing.

In any event, I get your point. I've consistently talked about Rivera's undying love of vets not only on cut day, but game days. I just don't see that being the issue here with a still unseasoned Crume, the importance of the delineation of roles in the running game, and the relatively little importance that a fullback plays in the modern NFL.

I got you @RoaringRiot

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say that I appreciated that Webb did anything the team asked: play WR, ST and QB3?  No problem.  He is a great dude, and Buffalo is going to be happy with what he does to the locker room.

On the flip side, that's the nature of the business.  You have to make the tough decisions.  Webb is not a starting QB in the NFL, and that's what this decision came down to. Webb kept some guys from making game day rosters, yet added little value outside of his ST position.  How many people have complained over the years that Hurney never made the tough cuts? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

About DA...this is his last year.  DA has saved our bacon in some games, but he's just aging out. He's got a mess of kids, many under 5.  This is it for him.  We need to develop Kayaa so that he can come in and do something for us.  The staff likes him, so there's that.  But this season, if Cam can't go, would you rather have a known quantity who has played and won for our team, a guy who only lights it up against 3-4th string players (Webb) or a developmental guy who put the ball on the ground in crunch time (Gilbert)?  So that's why we keep DA.

Some teams can afford the rookie mistakes, to let them grow and learn on the field.  We're not in that phase.  Sure, Cleveland is, but we stand a much better chance of winning than Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I'll say that I appreciated that Webb did anything the team asked: play WR, ST and QB3?  No problem.  He is a great dude, and Buffalo is going to be happy with what he does to the locker room.

On the flip side, that's the nature of the business.  You have to make the tough decisions.

The team making tough decisions doesn't bother me.

The fact that the two guys in charge now have a strong tendency to make the wrong decisions bothers me a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...