Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Christian McCaffrey's Presence Does To A Defense


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

To be fair he's probably the more classy Saints fan on this board. He's tolerable.

But yeah his CMC comments make me laugh. Sure, CMC had mistakes and he's a rookie. But to say he's a scatback is pretty laughable.

He's probably never even watched CMC play a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I mean, he got 18 touches, 2 less than Stewart. I didn't find it was all that centered around CMC. He just seemed to be the only guy Cam could hit consistsently today. He looked about like what I expected. Pretty hard to catch 1 on 1 in space. The problem is, NFL speed is different than college and the pursuit gets there a lot quicker after you make a guy miss. 

He averaged 3.6 a carry. He had a couple nice runs at the end of the game against a defeated defense. Before the drive had carried 10 times for 27 yards. 

Him having 2 nice runs at the end of the game doesn't change that he's a scatback.

First half = 5 rushes

5 yards

5 yards

3 yards

-2 yards

4 yards

If not for that -2 carry where the 49ers sold out on the run he would have averaged 4.25 yards per carry. 

 

But go ahead, keep trying to sell your silly "scat back" theory. No one is buying. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Saca312 said:

The gameplan Shula had was terrible. Completely hampered what CMC could've done by making him the sole focus rather than spread the ball around. 49ers knew that the ball was going to CMC. Panthers didn't even reveal much at all.

I have a feeling the Panthers came in not showing their full deck of cards. Expect that to happen around week 3 or 4 where we see this offense's full potential.

I'm not sure I agree with your assessment, because I don't think we saw the entire game plan.  Shula kept it slow and conservative and fed CMC a steady diet of "get used to the NFL" carries.  We showed a little wildcat and lined him up at WR, just enough to keep the 49ers guessing.  But I'm betting there's still a lot left to show, and once the Panthers started to assert themselves Shula elected to not show it.

I saw Samuel get on the field for a play that never executed because of a time-out.  When the Panthers took the field again he wasn't out there.  Did he get any snaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

First half = 5 rushes

5 yards

5 yards

3 yards

-2 yards

4 yards

If not for that -2 carry where the 49ers sold out on the run he would have averaged 4.25 yards per carry. 

 

But go ahead, keep trying to sell your silly "scat back" theory. No one is buying. 

 

Except, everyone outside of Carolina lol. I'm still trying to understand how YPC has anything to do with a runners running style anyway. 

Let me know when he breaks a tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

He averaged 3.6 a carry.

As did Jonathan Stewart.  

Is Jonathan Stewart a "scat back"?

9 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

He had a couple nice runs at the end of the game against a defeated defense. Before the drive had carried 10 times for 27 yards. 

Him having 2 nice runs at the end of the game doesn't change that he's a scatback.

Before that drive, Jonathan Stewart had carried the ball 11 times for 35 yards.

Is Jonathan Stewart a "scat back"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares if he doesn't fit someone's preconceived notion of what a running back is supposed to be.  He is clearly a weapon and did pretty well for his first game in the NFL.  Those who don't want to see how he opened things up (even on the Stewart touchdown), are just haters who choose to be blind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • overall agree on the draft grade as a whole on on each pick, but every time I read (and I have read it more than once) that we "gave up two firsts" for Bryce, I am confused. We gave up the 2024 first, but we swapped 2023 firsts, so we didn't give up anything there. We did give up our former first rounder in DJ, but I don't think thats what you mean as one of the "firsts" we gave up.
    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
×
×
  • Create New...