Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Navarro Bowman should be drug tested


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Apparently Navarro Bowman is quite obsessed with one Luke Kuechly, according to this article from Saturday before the game.

 

"Bowman, who twice brought up Kuechly without prompting during the interview, knows the perceived gulf between them has widened since their 2014 meeting in Charlotte."

“Our numbers - they’re not too far apart,” Bowman said. “But he’s still where he is. And I’m still scratching and clawing, trying to keep my head above water. Why is that?”

Bowman has a theory. He notes he was a third-round pick in 2010, while Kuechly was selected No. 9 overall in 2012.

“He got drafted in what round?” Bowman said. “So it makes (NFL evaluators) seem like they’re right. I got drafted in the third round, so any negative energy I bring toward my name, it makes them seem like they’re right.

 

Jealousy and insecurity isn't a good look, Bow.

 

“You watch this whole game of NaVorro Bowman,” he said. “And you watch this whole game of Luke Kuechly. You tell me who the best linebacker is.”

 

Ahem, Luke was credited 5 tackles, 2 assists and 1 interception on a defense that absolutely shut down the 49er offense 

Bowman had 3 tackles and 2 assists in a 23-3 loss.

 

http://m.sfgate.com/49ers/article/49ers-Bowman-orn-Kuechly-You-tell-me-who-12185275.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This quote about the 2014 playoff game is something else:

“It was Luke Kuechly this; it was Luke Kuechly that,” Bowman said during a recent hour-long interview. “We went out there and we beat the brakes off them. Nobody said anything. But I guarantee you, if Luke Kuechly would have done something they would have blown it up.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...