Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So About Worley Giving Up "Cushion" On That Last Drive Against Holmes


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, the Panthers corners were solid all game. However, all of a sudden Worley apparently does "bad" once again and is a "weak link" when he gives up some cushion to Holmes on the drive.

Well. Take a look at what Worley's doing pre-snap.

Appears some communication issues occurred from Worley to coaches. Without knowing what even he was supposed to do, he tried to wing it. Frustration ensued.

Worley's not at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

So, the Panthers corners were solid all game. However, all of a sudden Worley apparently does "bad" once again and is a "weak link" when he gives up some cushion to Holmes on the drive.

Well. Take a look at what Worley's doing pre-snap.

Appears some communication issues occurred from Worley to coaches. Without knowing what even he was supposed to do, he tried to wing it. Frustration ensued.

Worley's not at fault.

Everyone else got the call. Are you sure it's not his fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Something obviously messed up. Who knows.

Well they had to be using hand signals so he either missed them or couldn't see them. I still think if ten out of eleven guys get the signal, then it's your fault you didn't get it. And like @*FreeFua* said, know the situation and man up like the other corner is doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

Well they had to be using hand signals so he either missed them or couldn't see them. I still think if ten out of eleven guys get the signal, then it's your fault you didn't get it. And like @*FreeFua* said, know the situation and man up like the other corner is doing

Either way really it wasn't reflective of his play, rather just not aware of what's going on. 

I wouldn't fault his skill being an issue. But I can see how him not being aware is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...