Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Much Of A Difference Will Ryan Kalil Make In The Run Game? (Pretty Big)


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Seems not a lot of people are talking about this, but getting back Ryan Kalil will be huge, according to Matt Harmon. While people do like to point out how his communication will drastically improve everything, I'm surprised more are not talking about how his impact as a run blocker will help out tremendously.

Here's a look at his analysis of the Panthers run game:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000860683/article/christian-mccaffrey-panthers-run-game-disappoint

Quote

If there's one silver lining for Carolina, it's that they can point to a key factor as the root cause to their issues: the absence of star center Ryan Kalil from Week 2 on. The Next Gen Stats confirm Kalil is a difference-maker; the team's running backs averaged 0.18 yards before defenders closed within a yard in Week 1 and -0.45 in every game since.

Sure, some may try and point to that being a low sample size, but considering it was the first game with two new tackles, it still is pretty shocking to see how drastically performance changed without Kalil.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan is the reason why Norwell and Trai operate as well as they do. Your center has to be the jack of all trades lineman for a reason. He's gotta be able to handle that nose by himself in certain situations, he's gotta be able to pass block and know who to pick up and who to slide over if both A gaps are coming, he's gotta be able to chip and go to backer, and he HAS to be able to communicate all of this with both guards before the snap. Whether that is verbal, gesturing, or even just an unspoken understanding. Larsen isn't a bad player, he just lacks the experience. Trai and Norwell know and understand Ryan Kalil. A lot of the failures in the run game as far as blocking is concerned have to do with the center and guards, and it's because the understanding of who is doing what is lost at times. Couple that with Larsen just not being the same level of player that Ryan is, you get what we have.


Getting Ryan back will not fix Matt Kalil's inability to be consistent in his game. Only coaching will do that. Him letting his feet die, him not attacking, that's on him and the coaches for not correcting him. So while we will see more fluidity in the interior, our edges will remain a question mark until such time as Matt Kalil is something other than "the lesser Kalil".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, csx said:

Unless they get back to 3 point stances for run blocking not as much.

 

According to Moose.



3 point stance is important for power off the snap, but fundamentals are breaking down either way. For as much as everybody loves Matsko, something isn't clicking with this line that he is responsible for. Either they're failing to heed his coaching or he's failing to coach them. One of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...