Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HOLY FUG A RUN WITH POSITIVE YARDS


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I-Formation with a blocking fullback. Weird how that works. 

giphy.gif

Nice job by Armah here stifling a defensive end. 

 

It ain't pretty. It ain't exciting. But at the very least it is positive yards on a run play that would actually wear out a defense. 

 

Need more of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armah had this weird block earlier in the game where he lept forward, planted and then popped into a block

 

Wasn't really sure what to make of it other than he clearly isn't a natural at the position. He still probably needs to be out there though. Line him and Stewart up and just run when its working. Watching us sit Stewart down so we could watch McCaffrey pick up one yard over and over as the clock burned away in the 4th was like taking crazy pills

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurkN said:

Looks like Armah and Norwell were the only ones blocking while the rest of them were playing patty cake.

Look at the play design we left manhertz  to block a DT alone while our RT and RG block the same DT

lucky the play gained any yards depending on manhertz to block anyone alone 

agreed Norwell  and Armah did fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I-Formation with a blocking fullback. Weird how that works. 

giphy.gif

Nice job by Armah here stifling a defensive end. 

 

It ain't pretty. It ain't exciting. But at the very least it is positive yards on a run play that would actually wear out a defense. 

 

Need more of this. 

9 men in the box.  Running into that all game just gonna lead to a lot punting. 

Should be one on one coverage on the outside and a QB licking his chops.  

The answer to our running woes has to come from the pass game.  You run into 9 in the box....that is just math.  The play isn’t the run with those looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think opposing defenses have our run schemes pretty well figured out. 

Maybe we could, you know, adjust? 

generally 9 in the box stops run plays...regardless of how creative you are.  Unless the opposing D just stinks. 

Adjustment is to beat the one of one coverage and hit them for a big play.   You stack the box against Matt Ryan, or Brees or Winston in our division to stop a run play.....they are going to hit a huge pass play on you most of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What people fail to understand is Lance had a college career that lasted about as long as teenage boys first intercourse.  To say he was raw was an understatement.  So much so that even a QB whisperer had a difficult time molding him into a polished NFL product on top of multiple nagging injuries.  The dud is in his mid-twenties, finally healthy and little miles on the tread.  Low risk, high reward.  If he's available, it would be stupid not to kick the tires.  It took Darnold and Mayfield to hit their 3rd or 4th team for things to finally click.  This is Lance's 3rd stop, I believe.  It's either time for it to click for him or be relegated to a full time backup. Roll the dice....
    • Wrong.  At least we put a QB sneak in the play book and and add plays over 20 yards.
    • I don’t know if people realize that Evan’s was one of the top TE prospects in college  before having some horrible injuries. I wanna say he had two major injuries in back to back seasons which limited his play and dropped his draft stock.
×
×
  • Create New...