Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Isn’t Christian McCaffrey Panning Out?


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

the similarities between CMC and Reggie Bush are eerie. similar size. similar games. CMC will be very reliant upon his offensive line for push on his designed runs and will always be more valuable as a receiver. he's not a dive play running back. he needs space and he needs pulling linemen. the problem is that we don't have a strong road grading tackle to run behind on either side and our interior linemen are more suited to straight line blocking than pulling because they're insanely strong but not quick enough to get around the tackle for tosses and sweeps. 

the real idea should be to get him in a bunch formation behind Funchess and KB for quick hitter screens and let them go one on one with corners in matchups they should win no problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Vagrant said:

the similarities between CMC and Reggie Bush are eerie. similar size. similar games. CMC will be very reliant upon his offensive line for push on his designed runs and will always be more valuable as a receiver. he's not a dive play running back. he needs space and he needs pulling linemen. the problem is that we don't have a strong road grading tackle to run behind on either side and our interior linemen are more suited to straight line blocking than pulling because they're insanely strong but not quick enough to get around the tackle for tosses and sweeps. 

the real idea should be to get him in a bunch formation behind Funchess and KB for quick hitter screens and let them go one on one with corners in matchups they should win no problem. 

Ha.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Good one.

Did you see the gif of 17 in Jeremy's post earlier?

 

JK, I agree, but the effort just isn't there from our WR's, no matter their size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, CRA said:

people continue to try to figure out why things that aren't the problem....are the problem. 

Example.  How many threads have been dedicated to Cam and CMC not being good enough.  REALITY - they aren't the problem. 

 

 

How many people totally dismiss the fact we lack the WR talent to open up the offense.....and simply say you can scheme out of it or solve it with a RB/WR rookie that never even filled that role in college.  2017 = 2014.  Why the offense isn't working is simple.   We lack speed at WR.....and opposing defenses play the run as a result and the 3 routes Kev/Fun run well with no fear that anyone can beat them over the top.  So they play our WRs one on one knowing it takes X amount of time for them to get open on non-big play threatening routes.   Exact same thing occured in 2014.  Couldn't run....and couldn't make plays downfield.  Offense imploded and Cam took a beating.   

We need speed at WR and better OT play. That immediately transforms the offense. 

Yeah I find it bizarre how people are ignoring that we've needed a reliable slot receiver for years.  That fact he can rush at all is practically a bonus. Pick up a bruiser later if we have to.

Only real knock against McCaffrey is that we may have drafted him too high given his role, but it's a desperate need that was filled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did we change our blocking scheme for this evolved offense unnecessarily if it changed at all and not fitting our lines strengths for one player in CMC? I dont know if it changed but it is weird our line gets zero push nowadays. I know they are capable but it has to be their mindset to push people off the line and they are lacking that killer instinct. This is what I was getting at after the Saints game but then we somehow played decent two weeks in a row and it masked it although we didnt run worth a fug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

people continue to try to figure out why things that aren't the problem....are the problem. 

Example.  How many threads have been dedicated to Cam and CMC not being good enough.  REALITY - they aren't the problem. 

 

 

How many people totally dismiss the fact we lack the WR talent to open up the offense.....and simply say you can scheme out of it or solve it with a RB/WR rookie that never even filled that role in college.  2017 = 2014.  Why the offense isn't working is simple.   We lack speed at WR.....and opposing defenses play the run as a result and the 3 routes Kev/Fun run well with no fear that anyone can beat them over the top.  So they play our WRs one on one knowing it takes X amount of time for them to get open on non-big play threatening routes.   Exact same thing occured in 2014.  Couldn't run....and couldn't make plays downfield.  Offense imploded and Cam took a beating.   

We need speed at WR and better OT play. That immediately transforms the offense. 

It seemed like Shepard was getting a lot of deep catches in training camp but hasnt been going deep at all. We lost Byrd and Samuel hasnt been going deep either. I think we have the speed, you dont have to have 4.3 speed necessarily to do it, you just have to attempt it a few times to loosen up what you are referring to. Hell even Funchess has beaten guys multiple times down the field one on one but was not thrown to(quite a bit more last season). I dont think Shula has a real identity for this offense and what he wants to do and thats a huge problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way to early for this and he's been pretty good.  He's a rookie.  Jeez.  I do know Cam overthrew him by 10 feet on a crossing route last week with nothing but green in front of him.  Putting it all on CMC isn't fair IMO. 

I mean, a short dump pass to the right and CMC has to make a circus grab because of a Cam overthrow.  He consistently misses with these high throws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the draft I was an advocate of them drafting Fournette AND McCaffrey.

A bit unrealistic with how the draft panned out but he isn't the RB they needed. Everybody knew who they needed. He was gone.

Like other posters have said, they have failed to keep/aquire/draft a playmaker at receiver. 

Ginn could be unreliable but he had the same thing Smitty had, he was electric at times. 

Youve got the guy with maybe the best hands outside of Olsen, best route runner playing runningback in the NFL at under 215lbs. That's crazy.

People switch positions when they get to the NFL, no shame in that. When you try to prove otherwise you get guys hurt. He gets blown back too often.

He has the skills to play WR/PR in the NFL. Using him at runningback or in the wildcat should be the bonus not the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Before the draft I was an advocate of them drafting Fournette AND McCaffrey.

Youve got the guy with maybe the best hands outside of Olsen, best route runner playing runningback in the NFL at under 215lbs. That's crazy.

People switch positions when they get to the NFL, no shame in that. When you try to prove otherwise you get guys hurt. He gets blown back too often.

He has the skills to play WR/PR in the NFL. Using him at runningback or in the wildcat should be the bonus not the norm.

2 hours ago, Pantha-kun said:

If McCaffrey went to the Saints he'd probably be doing similar to Kamara or even better. He would've fit that team, coaches , and system alot better . 

 

See above. CMC is Edelman 2.0, but with a dash of Amendola, and the ability to run out of the backfield ON PROPERLY DESIGNED plays. If he was in NE or NO, the highlight reels would already be hitting file size limits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...