Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jarvis Landry


ncfan

Whats the max youd give up for Landry  

101 members have voted

  1. 1. Whats the max youd give up for Landry?

    • 2nd round pick
      11
    • 3rd round pick
      36
    • 4th round pick
      28
    • 5th round pick
      10
    • Meh the answers already on the roster
      5
    • Dont really need him but will take him if we send Shula back to his dads team
      12


Recommended Posts

I would love Landry, though he hasnt ever been used as a deep threat in Miami, not saying he cant but not sure I would use that to describe him. I think he would continue to thrive as an underneath route catch and run type guy which we could use but with this staff he wouldnt be used properly like other guys we already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3rd depending on the contract extension we could work out with him. He's a free agent after this year, so any trade would have to be contingent on working out a new long-term deal.
 

I'd give a 2nd for Hilton.

Then again, trading a Hurney controlled 2nd round pick is pretty much the equivalent of giving up a conditional 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

So now everyone wants a deep threat but all during free agency we were “fine”

Making adjustments after determining your problems is a critical step in our evolution from Ron in game to roster moves during the season. Not mandatory but shooting a shot increasing our 2 20 yard plays in like three games or something can bring a big boost to us our defense is literally sick four games holding a opponent that no td man let's look at the bigger picture the NFC is open let's make a dam deal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

Making adjustments after determining your problems is a critical step in our evolution from Ron in game to roster moves during the season. Not mandatory but shooting a shot increasing our 2 20 yard plays in like three games or something can bring a big boost to us our defense is literally sick four games holding a opponent that no td man let's look at the bigger picture the NFC is open let's make a dam deal 

The thing is, it shouldn’t have taken 8 games to determine that a deep/speed guy was needed. 

This is something that should’ve been taken care of in the offseason (hello DeSean Jackson). 

I want to see us make a trade just as bad as you but it’s not going to happen. This organization refuses to admit they’ve ever made a mistake. 

This whole building a competent offense, really isn’t as hard as the Panthers make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The thing is, it shouldn’t have taken 8 games to determine that a deep/speed guy was needed. 

This is something that should’ve been taken care of in the offseason (hello DeSean Jackson). 

I want to see us make a trade just as bad as you but it’s not going to happen. This organization refuses to admit they’ve ever made a mistake. 

This whole building a competent offense, really isn’t as hard as the Panthers make it out to be.

I think right now it has less to do with us admitting any mistake and a lot more due to the fact that Hurndog likely realizes that all he has to do to lock this job down long-term again is not do something rash that gets him fired in the meantime. He just needs to lay low and not cause any big waves and keep favored vets happy and it's all his. That's not a recipe for making a splash move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula and Cam. Needs to start featuring Samuels,  Clay, bryd as primary targets. We will never know their potential until its done. They need to be 1st reads bc Cam is so dependent on KB and Fun sometimes i dont believe he looks their way.. Maybe thats the way the play is design but who in the world has 4 wrs with only 2 being actively seeking the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...