Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, To The Point That Supposedly The 8th Overall Should Be An Immediate All-Pro, Here's A List Of The Last Ten 8th Overall Picks


Saca312

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Teams don't draft a slot receiver in the first round usually, let alone the top 10.

 

I think CMC will have a fine career and the Panthers could have done worse at pick 8. I'm just not sold that his production could not be found in later rounds and the Panthers address more pressing needs at pick 8. 

Teams absolutely and obvioysly would and should if disturbed out to be Colston or Boldin or Seller or Nelson or Welker. Whats the point of a general statement like that? Teams would do it in a heart beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, csx said:

Teams absolutely and obvioysly would and should if disturbed out to be Colston or Boldin or Seller or Nelson or Welker. Whats the point of a general statement like that? Teams would do it in a heart beat.

Show me. List the slot receivers taken in the top 10. I'm not interested in what you think they would do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Show me. List the slot receivers taken in the top 10. I'm not interested in what you think they would do. 

What?

What happened and what teams would have done in retrospect are different. That was my point.

Bringing up what teams do is irrelevant to the value of a draft pick in retrospect. Picking the position that seems flashy at the timecdoesnt help if you select a bust tackles or qbs in the top 10 which happens all the time.

You think teams worry about which round they picked a good player in after the fact if it doesn't go by the book logic?

 

Quit swaying in the wind. Slow down and see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2017 at 1:08 AM, csx said:

At the same point in their careers the following Panthers would be considered busts by the Huddle

Smith

Moose

Kuechly

Davis

Olsen

Short

Jenkins

Norman

Gamble 

Who else?

 

I don't think CMC is a bust, but Kuechly was Rookie of the Year and Smith was well on his way to the pro bowl. No one would have labeled them busts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Car123 said:

I don't think CMC is a bust, but Kuechly was Rookie of the Year and Smith was well on his way to the pro bowl. No one would have labeled them busts.

 

Luke didn't take off until mid / end of season. Smith was a special teams only guy his rookie year. If he was drafted now people would be upset with that as a rookie considering he had 154 yds receiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

True. I think he proved that he wasn't a bust prior to the whole fiasco. 

This probably deserves a thread or two for further discussion.

Absolutely true, no doubt.  And great idea.  No better time than the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Car123 said:

I don't think CMC is a bust, but Kuechly was Rookie of the Year and Smith was well on his way to the pro bowl. No one would have labeled them busts.

 

 

    Although the execution left a little to be desired. The basic concept was there. I think too many Panther fans look at CmC's rushing numbers, and are not happy. They are willing to overlook what is happening in the passing game for whatever reason, to make their stance sound better. Yet, the vast majority see the value he brings.

 

    Keek did win DROY, YEA. Loved it. But Smitty? Not so much. As@csx stated. If Smitty, even as a 3rd rounder, had been drafted last year. Most folks would be riding his azz like a broke bronc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...