Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Gameday Thread...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, Pantha-kun said:

Early signs don't look good. Lattimore playing and olsen is out. If our other keep dropping passes and cam is off again today , we will be obliterated 

Except for the one long run by Kamara, the Rams pretty much shut down saints last week. If we can control the run, we have a great chance to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Unfortunately, I'd love to talk smack, but this is a game where having Benjamin (yes, I know he's hurt, but that was directly due to a hit against San Diego) would be necessary. Cam literally has Funchess, CMC and Dickson. Other than that we have 2 WRs who've had at least 4 really bad drops the past few weeks. For all the spreading around talk, Shepard has 3 receptions and 3 drops, Clay has 1 reception and 1 drop and Bersin has 1 reception in the past 3 games. Byrd hasn't played in months, so to rely on him when he's got 1 career NFL reception.

Cam has 3 reliable guys right now and that's not a recipe for spreading the ball around. We need to run the ball well, period and we need to stop the run. If we don't, we will likely get beat bad. Sucks to not have Olsen.

Agreed and if funchess is shut down by lattimore we need to have cmc with a career game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...