Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There are 2 types of people posting about how the Panthers are going to move: trolls and fuging idiots

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Sam Mills Fan Newbie

Sam Mills Fan

Posted
Posted

Consider this is a PSA to the Huddle and all of Panther World: there is no chance of the Panthers moving. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nul. Nula. The team has consistently been in the top half of the league in revenue, has sold out every game since 2002, has a built-in PSL machine working very well, a city with leaders that would rename the city's name to Panthers if it meant keeping the team here, Richardson won't sell to someone that wants to move the team, there's no logical place for the team to move to, the league would do everything in its power to keep the team here, a move would trigger a relocation fee of no less than $500 million for a new ownership team about to spend $2 billion to buy the team in the first place...WE ARE NOT MOVING. Stop engaging with people worried about it or suggesting it, there's literally a better chance of Mister deciding to cut Cam and Luke for some reason this week than the team ever moving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TNPanther Rising Star

TNPanther

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

The Charlotte Observer article about JR selling pretty much saying in it how easy it would be for a new owner to move the team certainly isn't helping things...

When will people learn that the Fake News Observer only serves to stir poo up? There is not a chance in hell this team moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

The Charlotte Observer article about JR selling pretty much saying in it how easy it would be for a new owner to move the team certainly isn't helping things...

But they were just talking about the tether that was agreed to between the city and team a few years ago.  Since it was designed to make it difficult for the team to move, they were making sure people understand that it will not be much of a factor for a new owner.  They weren't talking at all about anything else that would be involved with moving the team.  

However, I do agree that some people that only look at the surface and don't understand all that is involved with moving a team could read into it and make more out of it than there was.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

Every team that has relocated has basically done it because of stadium issues. Eventually our owner, whoever that is, will say we need a new stadium. If Charlotte ponies up some decent public money then there is no chance the Panthers go anywhere. If Charlotte says f u you get nothing then you can't look at history and say there is no chance of moving. The NFL has been happy to vote yes to owners who want to move into a shiny new stadium without hesitation. We just saw it happen three times. That will not change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sam Mills Fan Newbie

Sam Mills Fan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

Every team that has relocated has basically done it because of stadium issues. Eventually our owner, whoever that is, will say we need a new stadium. If Charlotte ponies up some decent public money then there is no chance the Panthers go anywhere. If Charlotte says f u you get nothing then you can't look at history and say there is no chance of moving. The NFL has been happy to vote yes to owners who want to move into a shiny new stadium without hesitation. We just saw it happen three times. That will not change.

There isn't a city in America more likely to do whatever an NFL owner tells them to do than Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...