Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl wants Panthers to remain in the Carolinas


jfra78

Recommended Posts

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21839807/nfl-first-choice-carolina-panthers-remain-charlotte

"The franchise in Carolina is successful both on the field and from a business perspective as far as community impact,'' Lockhart said. "So we think that it's very important that franchises, particularly ones that have achieved the success of the Panthers, stay in the market where they're playing."

Good news for all Panther fans!

Also in in the article was an outline for purchasing a franchise

 

During the call, Lockhart outlined what the sale of the Panthers involved. He said the new controlling owner:

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

  • Must to be able to demonstrate financial wherewithal to acquire and effectively operate the team.

  • Must have full voting control over all matters involving the club and stadium, including all football operations.

  • Cannot exhaust his or her (total) financial resources to make a bare-minimum equity acquisition.

  • Is limited to a maximum of $250 million in total debt related to the club. Other debt is permitted beyond that debt ceiling, but it has to be collateralized by non-football assets.

In addition to that:

  • The payment must be paid in cash or financed.

  • A new ownership group is limited to a maximum of 25 co-owners.

  • A public company or not-for-profit can't buy the team.

  • All owners must be approved by three-quarters (24 of 32) of member clubs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, countryboi said:

 

so when someone buys the panthers they are going to pull up with 3 billion dollars in cash? that sounds like the plot to an oceans 11 movie. 

Doesn’t mean physical cash. Means cash assets as in money in a checking account or other type of account that can be wired out.

 

im just wondering what JR is gonna do with all his Bils 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

Doesn’t mean physical cash. Means cash assets as in money in a checking account or other type of account that can be wired out.

 

im just wondering what JR is gonna do with all his Bils 

Him, Smitty and TD will all have a nice dinner?0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherCam213 said:

I would think this.

All owners must be approved by three-quarters (24 of 32) of member clubs

That's not his problem, this is his problem 

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

30 Percent of the Panthers is 750 million dollars for a guy that has net worth of 800 million. Like I said before the NFL is a billionaire game. Diddy never had a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, countryboi said:

That's not his problem, this is his problem 

  • Is required to individually own at least 30 percent of equity. (Most owners typically own more than that, and some own 100 percent).

30 Percent of the Panthers is 750 million dollars for a guy that has net worth of 800 million. Like I said before the NFL is a billionaire game. Diddy never had a chance

Supposedly ESPN says Diddy signed paperwork but hard to believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...