Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steelers released James Harrison.. Situational pass rusher?


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

With CJ out until playoffs and him not having much pass rush anymore any way..  It wouldn't hurt having more pass rush for a playoff run.. Harrison has only played in 5 games this year and is still in good shape.. Using CJ for run downs.. Wilkes could be killer with a blitz package featuring Pep, Addison, Harrison, TD, and Short.. What do you guys think??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Would he play OLB? I Guess. If he signs for vet min then why the hell not lol 

Last news story I heard was him not being satsified with his almost non existant role in Pittsburg

Situational pass rusher DE..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

He's washed up. He played 20 some snaps in 5 games this year and was a healthy scratch in most of the games. Kind of doubt anyone takes a shot on him to be honest.

Washed up my ass,  dude can lift the gym. Even outlift those young buck D and O linemen. Sign him for situational rushing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...