Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Byrd to IR, and other Tuesday news


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, luke nukem said:

too many injuries at WR to overcome. Trading KB was just a bad bad move.

Did you see the Catch against New England.  Never can catch the ball clean always has to catch it twice 3rd and a 7th that was a steal for that WR makes the hard catch look easy and drops the easy catches. well he doesn't always drop them but when he has to catch 3 times hes out of bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Captain Obvious said:

Ya'll acting like Cam has never gotten us to a super bowl with jag WR's before. I think it makes him a better QB. 

I think we will be better than before. I have faith in Cam.

I just wish we could grab some "kind of a guy" receivers. Imagine how great that would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thomas96 said:

Britt would not be any better for us than Mose Frazier.

Are you on drugs.. And not weed I'm talking about the really fuged up poo that have you stealing napkin holders from your mom house and sucking dick for a hit?? Please tell me this is what's going on with you now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Captain Obvious said:

Ya'll acting like Cam has never gotten us to a super bowl with jag WR's before. I think it makes him a better QB. 

I think we will be better than before. I have faith in Cam.

 

And there is this:

 

 

This isn't even Jag WR's.. At least Jags could make other ppl teams..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Dragoon11 said:

Media is speaking about how "Byrd has been a contributing factor recently on offense". You can have all the talent in the world, but if you can't stay on the field and stay healthy, you're not contributing much. Not saying it's Byrd's fault or anything. Maybe he's just too small for the NFL, either way he seems very fragile, or just has the worst luck ever. Either way....In this business, you have to be on the field....Wish him the best for the future, hope he can shake this injury bug.

Wtf he had a direct hit on his forearm at full speed and player roll his leg in which a player behind to prevent him from falling back. He is not injure prone. Heyzus I can't stand the narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Talking about the playoffs....that is IF we lose. I have complete faith in cam he will do everything he can but this is just getting to look like a ridiculous up hill battle. Just saying we all know he is gonna get the blame from outside the fanbase. 

I mean, this team is 11-4....They were winning before Byrd even came off the first IR. To think that having Damiere Byrd is the difference between us winning and losing a playoff game is a stretch at very least. Panthers have found ways to win....PERIOD. If we lose it won't be because Byrd was injured. It will be because we were outmatched from top to bottom......Playoff football can expose ALL your teams weaknesses. To be honest, this Panthers team reminds me of the 2003 McNabb Eagles. Just with a more mobile QB. What caused the eagles to lose to Panthers that year was the inability of receivers to get off very aggressive Panthers DB's jamming them at the line. They couldn't deal with physical Db's to get open. Way to counter that is a strong run game. Eagles didn't have that. This Panthers team shows the potential to have a better run game. Plus Eagles didn't have a Greg Olsen type TE.....Their receiving corp was much worse, yet they made it to NFC championship game....My point is, Byrd injury hurts, but it hardly seals our playoff fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What other fanbase would be content with pooping posts calling out a front office that continually allows their franchise QB to be forced to throw to one of the worst WR corps in the league? Particularly facing an uphill battle entering the postseason?

I swear I think some of you have become so accustomed to mediocrity that you actually like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ecu88 said:

Wtf he had a direct hit on his forearm at full speed and player roll his leg in which a player behind to prevent him from falling back. He is not injure prone. Heyzus I can't stand the narrative.

It is what it is man....Trust me, I was loving how this kid was coming along. Call it bad luck, whatever....Has to find a way to ward off injuries. All I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dragoon11 said:

I mean, this team is 11-4....They were winning before Byrd even came off the first IR. To think that having Damiere Byrd is the difference between us winning and losing a playoff game is a stretch at very least. Panthers have found ways to win....PERIOD. If we lose it won't be because Byrd was injured. It will be because we were outmatched from top to bottom......Playoff football can expose ALL your teams weaknesses. To be honest, this Panthers team reminds me of the 2003 McNabb Eagles. Just with a more mobile QB. What caused the eagles to lose to Panthers that year was the inability of receivers to get off very aggressive Panthers DB's jamming them at the line. They couldn't deal with physical Db's to get open. Way to counter that is a strong run game. Eagles didn't have that. This Panthers team shows the potential to have a better run game. Plus Eagles didn't have a Greg Olsen type TE.....Their receiving corp was much worse, yet they made it to NFC championship game....My point is, Byrd injury hurts, but it hardly seals our playoff fate.

11-4 comes from the regular season where we weren't facing good teams every week. This is the PLAYOFFS. You are going up against the best teams in the conference every week. Game planning is different, everything is different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...