Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Told you so..


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

I knew once Ron and Marty did that punk poo.. "The answer is on the roster" poo..  The same old lame posters would defend the decision.. And poo poo anybody idea of bringing in some help.. That they would be the 1st ppl blaming Cam and making 10,000 threads about it... Of course you have your normal Cam hating Trolls who wait under poo piles to spew there BS.. But these guys who act like they know football and tell ppl we don't need this or that or we don't have to sign every name player when they are available in position of need.. But then come back and complain when the poo they knew was fuged up actual happens.. Are the worst.. And I knew Either Cam or Shula would be blame.. Instead of the fact you sent them out with JV talent and said make it happen..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except today's loss was more on Cam than anything else.

WRs are a part of the problem, but that was the case in the first Falcons meeting. Our WRs are not good and their LBs are fast enough to stay with CMC and Greg. That's why we won by running that game.

No one is saying this WR core is amazing but to put this loss on them is ignorant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

Chemistry doh

Yeah like Cam and Olsen.. We knew this poo would happen.. But every time yoh make a thread about this guy could help or let's give a tryout to that guy.. Here come the same set of dumbasses to say the same crap over and over again.. "if this guy could help he would already be doing this and that" duh.. But as soon as poo like this happen here they come to complain about it...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Belichick could have coached us to a win tonight. Too many injuries and our QB inexplicably couldn't hit the broadside of a barn. Next week it will be better. We're no worse off tonight than we were at 3:30 pm today.

But, by all means, don't let us get in the way of your poo-filled hissy fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rags said:

Except today's loss was more on Cam than anything else.

WRs are a part of the problem, but that was the case in the first Falcons meeting. Our WRs are not good and their LBs are fast enough to stay with CMC and Greg. That's why we won by running that game.

No one is saying this WR core is amazing but to put this loss on them is ignorant. 

Dude Cam was bad but again every QB has a bad game.. The difference is you can see ppl weren't getting open any way.. Olsen was running wrong routes and every time Cam scramble and look down field nothing was open... At least Brady knows he can count on Gronk, Lewis and Amendola to make a play when he is off.. Oh and that his FO will do anything to get him some help... There is a difference..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Dude Cam was bad but again every QB has a bad game.. The difference is you can see ppl weren't getting open any way.. Olsen was running wrong routes and every time Cam scramble and look down field nothing was open... At least Brady knows he can count on Gronk, Lewis and Amendola to make a play when he is off.. Oh and that his FO will do anything to get him some help... There is a difference..

I'm not trashing Cam, nor am I saying I don't think he won't recover from this game, or that our receivers are reliable I literally said that in my post, I even gave the example of how the Same Exact Thing happened in our first Meetup with the Falcons.

My point is that the WRs playing bad have very little to do with our loss today because they've been bad All Year. This is the same exact lineup we had against the Jets, just add in Fraizer.

This is hardly the game you can use to make a case for our WRs cost us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

I'm not trashing Cam, nor am I saying I don't think he won't recover from this game, or that our receivers are reliable I literally said that in my post, I even gave the example of how the Same Exact Thing happened in our first Meetup with the Falcons.

My point is that the WRs playing bad have very little to do with our loss today because they've been bad All Year. This is the same exact lineup we had against the Jets, just add in Fraizer.

This is hardly the game you can use to make a case for our WRs cost us.

 

I said Cam cost us.. But I knew it was going to happen because he isn't uber accurate consistently  and against this defense you need either your QB being that.. Or play makers who can make plays.. We have neither and we didn't try to help the situation at all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the fug does WR being bad have nothing to do with our loss today??

Running wrong routes not getting separation had nothing to do with the loss today??

What about not making contested catches or dropping passes or not blocking for smoke screens and running plays leading to Tfl?? Did that not help in this loss?? 

Cam had his faults (and should get most of the blame) but the rest of the offense was trash as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
    • They will still be a playoff team but they aren't contenders anymore IMO. They won't be able to spend like they have when they went to a SB and proved he couldn't carry a win at that level with a really good team around him. Now he is going to have to do it with less to spend around him. They just locked in to being a playoff bound team that's going to be a known speed bump for whoever will represent the NFC in the SB.
    • Hmm. I think he'll live up to it. Last year, about half of his team was on IR it seems, at one time or another. Year before, Super Bowl appearance. Year before that, playoff run after being third on the depth chart and being pressed into service. Is he one of the greatest in the game right now? Nope. No chance of that. Is he in the top 10 going into next season? Pretty good chance of that.  Would 20 or more teams in this league love to have the guy as their starting QB. Most likely so. He's a good QB who can implement his coach's game plan to a T and has both the confidence of and confidence in his teammates. That'll take you a long way in this league if you've got the right cast around you, and he does.  
×
×
  • Create New...