Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Louis Riddick comments on Panthers passing game

Yaboychris28

By Yaboychris28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Yaboychris28 Newbie

Yaboychris28

Posted
Posted

http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=21932246

Sorry guys having trouble embedding.  Anyways, Louis Riddick is known for being arguably the most knowledgeable football analyst on TV. He pretty much said after re watching the Carolina vs ATL game, Carolina's wide outs got no separation all game long.. Also, the wide receivers were running day 1 training camp routes for the entire duration of the game, not challenging ATL's secondary at all. It's something us fans have noticed, but it was nice for a mainstream analyst to recognize Shulas deficiencies. Unlike Troy Aikman who talks Shula up all the time.

 

I thought it was worth the 1:30 watch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Some of us have been screaming about Shula's poor play design for a long, long time.

Shula has moments, maybe even brief streaks, of brilliance when it comes to playcalling and gameplanning, no doubt. Unfortunately though those are more the exception and less the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
luke nukem Newbie

luke nukem

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Shula has moments, maybe even brief streaks, of brilliance when it comes to playcalling and gameplanning, no doubt. Unfortunately though those are more the exception and less the rule.

every game this year it seems we have gotten that one autismo drive that is like 16 plays, 8 minutes and ends in a TD. The rest of the game though... nada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

Anybody that's a little bit knowledgeable see the routes as a problem. I notice we do a lot of bunch formation loading one side, I see a lot of congestion with our routes. I posted this in the bills game, there were times where Cam didn't have a passing option on his right side. All you saw was the green field. Why? We have to spread defenses out evenly. Cam should have a target on each area of the field.

When do we do spread them out and go empty back-field, it's usually a Cam draw. It happens ALL THE TIME. How can you not expect teams to not notice this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted

Aikman is jealous and quite possibly a racist, they poo on Cam all game long and find ways to talk him down. If Cam throws an interception (what a terrible throw). Aaron Rodgers throws and interception (The wr has to run a better route) the agenda has gotten old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Aikman is jealous and quite possibly a racist, they poo on Cam all game long and find ways to talk him down. If Cam throws an interception (what a terrible throw). Aaron Rodgers throws and interception (The wr has to run a better route) the agenda has gotten old. 

Aikman definitely called out the constant players in the same area a couple times. He didnt put it all on Cam last week, he definitely called out the routes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

Riddick quote from the video:

Quote

"If you expand it outwards, the wide receivers need to work better to get open in that game, 'cause when you watch the All-22 of that game (and I was looking at it this morning) nobody was getting open against the Falcons at all.  And then the route designs were like Day One Install as far as, like, training camp type stuff, so it the Falcons were like "Really? This is what you're gonna run? Then we're gonna make your quarterback struggle.  He's gonna have a tough day here."

Sounds really, really familiar to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=21932246

Sorry guys having trouble embedding.  Anyways, Louis Riddick is known for being arguably the most knowledgeable football analyst on TV. He pretty much said after re watching the Carolina vs ATL game, Carolina's wide outs got no separation all game long.. Also, the wide receivers were running day 1 training camp routes for the entire duration of the game, not challenging ATL's secondary at all. It's something us fans have noticed, but it was nice for a mainstream analyst to recognize Shulas deficiencies. Unlike Troy Aikman who talks Shula up all the time.

 

I thought it was worth the 1:30 watch

Good stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, beastson said:

Aikman definitely called out the constant players in the same area a couple times.

On one of Cam's interceptions, there was essentially three receivers in the exact same area.  So what happened when he overthrew it?  Why, it went directly to the defender who was covering the Carolina receiver very close *behind* the Carolina receiver that was overthrown (Olsen I think).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...