Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nascar’s Brian France Reportedly Pushing As Possible Majority Owner For Panthers


Saca312

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Udogg said:

Why the no dome people? 

Concerts/Superbowls/College bowl games/etc..  = more tax revenue, more business opportunities?  Why do people hate the dome aspect?

Just wondering. 

I don't want a dome simply because I feel the game should be played outside.  I totally understand the business side and there's not a true rebuttal that domes have better chances for more events, BUT as is, The Bank has and can have those events now. Beyonce went to outdoor stadiums, Superbowl has been in NY, etc.  

From a fan perspective domes seem more cheese and crackers crowd than a good sporting event.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, YungHamm said:

I don't want a dome simply because I feel the game should be played outside.  I totally understand the business side and there's not a true rebuttal that domes have better chances for more events, BUT as is, The Bank has and can have those events now. Beyonce went to outdoor stadiums, Superbowl has been in NY, etc.  

From a fan perspective domes seem more cheese and crackers crowd than a good sporting event.  

That's my opinion too. Football should be played outside in any and all elements on grass. Turf fields and domes hurt the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Domes do not hurt the game. The whole “play in all elements” is dumb as hell. I want to see the worlds best go up against each other and I don’t need a sh!tty snow storm determining the outcome of a game.

Every Super Bowl should be played in a dome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agree to disagree you are entitled to that opinion even though I find the argument completely bizarre based on data. I could type out a long paragraph discussing those areas but what’s the point. I posted a screenshot that showed Bryce in a similar post snap situation with a free rusher in his face which resulted in a TD - that’s what happened on the play so I posted it. 
    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
×
×
  • Create New...