Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calling it now, expect a player house cleaning


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Some big names at that. They are long time staples of the team.

I think Charles Johnson and Ryan Kalil are sitting very dangerously on the cutting block as well as Jonathan Stewart. All 3 are playing way past their prime and could be replaced by comparable players a fraction of their current contract and we need more space now to sign players like Norwell and Star. 

If someone can find and repost the Matt Kalil contract stipulation that basically makes his contract a 1 year rental at first that would be great. Becuase I’m trying to figure out what his contract impact would be if cut, thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B.BERSIN said:

CJ is definitely gone. Ryan? No.

If Larsen hadn’t played so well when he filled in I’d have agreed with you. We save 7mil if we cut him and he’s and old expensive player that missed the majority of the season.

I’d honestly would cut Kalil and offer him the O-line coach job, dude knows his stuff. Extremely smart player, just doesn’t have it physically anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beastson said:

Matt is here to stay without a restructure. Terrible ass contract for bust of a player. Gettlemajic

Back when he was signed a few of us offseason geeks figured out that his contract was just a 1 year rental at first. So I’m curious if someone could dig that up again. I can’t because I’m stuck on my phone at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stew gone - should be but won't be we're the Panthers

CJ gone - easily even Rivera/Hurney can't fug that up and it's not much the won't fug up

TD should be gone but won't be

Won't be surprised at all when we lose Norwell at the expense of our old fat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Stew gone - should be but won't be we're the Panthers

CJ gone - easily even Rivera/Hurney can't fug that up and it's not much the won't fug up

TD should be gone but won't be

Won't be surprised at all when we lose Norwell at the expense of our old fat.

Why TD? He’s not played bad at all, he’s a bit slower then he used to be, but still clearly he second best LB’er on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't get rid of Kalil.  He lifts the entire offensive line.

For Stewart, it's a value thing.  We can get another younger RB who can do his job.  CJ has been done all season.  

We are really thing at DE, and it gets worse if Peppers retires.  

I do see that Hurney is going to have to cut some of his guys.  Sucks, but this is the business side of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at the people who are saying Ryan Kalil.

We can’t cut Ryan, maybe restructure him but we can’t roll with Larsen.

As long as Matt is here which he will be next season he needs Ryan here for support (as pathetic as that sounds). 

Our line will be exactly the same next season. Then in 2019 Moton will replace Matt and we’ll have to find a Ryan replacement 

Copy and pasted my post from another thread since so many of you struggle to understand why Kalil isn’t going anywhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...