Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I overreacting to say we need an entire secondary change?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Both corners, slot corner and safeties need to be replaced. Your secondary needs to be independent of your pass rush, not dependent. What we have now aint got the answers Sway

I would call the Seahawks and ask what would like for Earl Thomas. I'm going after Malcolm Butler, TJ Ward, I'm bringing Tre Boston back and Kyle Fuller if we can't get him. I wish we could bring Leonard Johnson back but we're stuck with Captain it seems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea

We need to replace the S's though. Even if we changed all of our secondary and keep those old DEs without getting younger there it won't matter if our better corners have to cover for longer and the WR gets open anyway.

The best way to win is with pressure so even with our CBs we need to keep the DEs strong and younger. The Saints have literally 100X the secondary we did and we coulda won the game and they didn't make poo for plays on the ball...Clay just dropped it and 79 yards from half a funchess is respectable....shows you what pressure does as NO beat us with pressure not from their elite secondary.

Last time i checked they let Bersin do em
Last time I checked they let CMC get his best play of the year
Last time I checked Funchess has like 1 arm and a leg out there doing 79 on em.
Last time I checked Cam went for 349 and 2 shoulda been 4(fun/Clay)
Last time I checked Olsen 3rd leg Gregged em.

Passrush bruh...sack won em the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, beastson said:

Both corners, slot corner and safeties need to be replaced. Your secondary needs to be independent of your pass rush, not dependent. What we have now aint got the answers Sway

I would call the Seahawks and ask what would like for Earl Thomas. I'm going after Malcolm Butler, TJ Ward, I'm bringing Tre Boston back and Kyle Fuller if we can't get him. I wish we could bring Leonard Johnson back but we're stuck with Captain it seems

I don’t like who we have.  I think we need 5 new starters.  It’s just going to be tough to fill all those holes in one offseason with limited cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Yea

We need to replace the S's though. Even if we changed all of our secondary and keep those old DEs without getting younger there it won't matter if our better corners have to cover for longer and the WR gets open anyway.

The best way to win is with pressure so even with our CBs we need to keep the DEs strong and younger. The Saints have literally 100X the secondary we did and we coulda won the game and they didn't make poo for plays on the ball...Clay just dropped it and 79 yards from half a funchess is respectable....shows you what pressure does as NO beat us with pressure not from their elite secondary.

Last time i checked they let Bersin do em
Last time I checked they let CMC get his best play of the year
Last time I checked Funchess has like 1 arm and a leg out there doing 79 on em.
Last time I checked Cam went for 349 and 2 shoulda been 4(fun/Clay)
Last time I checked Olsen 3rd leg Gregged em.

Passrush bruh...sack won em the game.

Rivera is a biiiiig believer in pass rush.

So yeah, don't expect major changes on the back end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing people need to remember is we played a lot of good quarterbacks this year. Brees and Ryan x2. Stafford, Brady, Rodgers, Wentz. Even guys like Keenum and Winston were plenty productive this year. When a good QB is on and isn't getting pressured, they will carve up even the best secondaries. LOB at the height of it's powers wouldn't have slowed down Brees last night. 

With that said, yes of course the secondary needs work. Hell, every position group other than QB needs to be looked at improved on a yearly basis. The glaring weakness though is safety, too many times we were beat over the top when a safety should have been in position to stop the play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Randolph Panther said:

Bradbury has really been a disappointment this year. After last year I thought he was going to be a lock down cornerback 

Not sure what you saw out of him that would make you think he would be a lockdown corner. I did think he could be a serviceable CB after last season, but man did he just look lost out there this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FugAllY'all said:

One thing people need to remember is we played a lot of good quarterbacks this year. Brees and Ryan x2. Stafford, Brady, Rodgers, Wentz. Even guys like Keenum and Winston were plenty productive this year. When a good QB is on and isn't getting pressured, they will carve up even the best secondaries. LOB at the height of it's powers wouldn't have slowed down Brees last night. 

With that said, yes of course the secondary needs work. Hell, every position group other than QB needs to be looked at improved on a yearly basis. The glaring weakness though is safety, too many times we were beat over the top when a safety should have been in position to stop the play. 

They also let Josh McCown roast them. The only QBs who didn't do anything were Hoyer, Taylor, & Trubisky. Otherwise, every other QB we played had their way. If the secondary was capable of creating some turnovers, that could at least excuse the infinite amount of passing yards they give up each game. Unfortunately, nobody in our secondary can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...