Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney is "the worst GM in the NFL"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, top dawg said:

People say he got worse over time, but I don't  necessarily think it's on point.   Although I can't prove it,  I believe that Richardson hampered Hurney the last few years.  But, even still,  Cam and Luke were products of the last couple of years. 

Look,  I am not trying to be a Marty apologist,  just looking to see what he does this next few months before evaluating if he has really learned anything that gives me hope for the future. 

 

A part of the GM's job is the draft....a part.  And a part of the draft is the 1st round...a part.

Hurney was pretty good in the 1st, outside of that, not so good.

Another part of the GM's job is cap management, which Hurney was absolutely unqualified for, and quite frankly awful at.  That is what scares folks like me, who enjoy the cam management side of the business, about handing the reins back to Hurndog.

 

We are going to be in a cap mess pretty soon, unless we navigate this offseason well, and Hurney has given me no faith that he can make the right decisions on drafting for depth, who to sigh long term, who to cut, and how to structure the contracts.

We have a franchise QB, in what should be his prime years, and an inept GM, the fans deserve better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

People say he got worse over time, but I don't  necessarily think it's on point.   Although I can't prove it,  I believe that Richardson hampered Hurney the last few years.  But, even still,  Cam and Luke were products of the last couple of years. 

Look,  I am not trying to be a Marty apologist,  just looking to see what he does this next few months before evaluating if he has really learned anything that gives me hope for the future. 

 

Regardless of what he does, he'll still be hampered by his background.

Marty Hurney was never a scout. He went from being a reporter to being a PR guy to being an assistant to being a cap manager to being a GM. It fits Jerry Richardson's pattern of overrewarding loyalty. That's how we got a guy from the ticket office as our Director of Pro Personnel and a logistics guy as our Assistant GM.

Here's hoping that kind of crap is over with Richardson gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

But the worst things this idiot ever did was trading away first rounders to move up in the draft for Otah  and Brown.  That took years to overcome.  And he is reported to have offered a first  rounder to move up to pick #33 with the Rams and take JImmy Clausen.  Heck, when we drafted Clausen (at 48 or something like that) 2 teams that desperately needed QBs at the time--KC and Minnesota--passed on  him--in the second round.  THEY had done their homework.  It is also the same draft that Marty traded up in the third to draft---Armanti Edwards.  Wait, he was not through---he then drafted Eric Norwood--a bust 3-4 OLB and we were a 4-3 team. 

This is all you need to know. For all the folks who got here with Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TN05 said:

The only reason the Johnson deal happened was to keep him from going to Atlanta.

understood, but what he offered CJ was WAAAAY more than they were offering. that was his way of negotiating. beg and throw more money than anyone else would think of doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't think there's anyone who would have chosen to bring Hurney back on this forum.  All I am saying is that now that he's here we should hope that the man has learned a thing or two (or three,  or four,  etc.). Most people may just be stupid,  I get it,  but there are a few that still have and appreciate a capacity for learning.  Hurney is in an extremely unique position. He's had time to observe,  commiserate,  pontificate,  and simply reflect.  Now is his time to mix all that knowledge in a pot and improve upon earlier efforts.  A person doesn't get that opportunity as a GM in the NFL with the same franchise after being fired. I find it intriguing. 

He only came back because JR never wanted him gone in the first place.  There is no justification what so ever to bring back a GM with his track record.  You can't fix stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

understood, but what he offered CJ was WAAAAY more than they were offering. that was his way of negotiating. beg and throw more money than anyone else would think of doing.

There have been several times when commentators stated that Hurney was "bidding against himself".

I've never been convinced that the Falcons would have offered Johnson anywhere close to what we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Natural said:

Are we pretending the Matt Kalil contract didn't happen? 

Once again, that contract isn't nearly as bad as everyone in the media, and for that matter on this board are spouting about, but don't let facts stand in the way.

This was essentially a 2 year, $30M deal.  That contract was structured so we could cut Matt after 2 years with very little pain...of if you want it in real terms...exactly the opposite of how Hurney normally structures his contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

A part of the GM's job is the draft....a part.  And a part of the draft is the 1st round...a part.

Hurney was pretty good in the 1st, outside of that, not so good.

 

When he stayed in his draft spot and made a selection in the 1st the results were good. When he tried to get clever and traded away future #1s to take a pick he thought merited the move failure was the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

Once again, that contract isn't nearly as bad as everyone in the media, and for that matter on this board are spouting about, but don't let facts stand in the way.

This was essentially a 2 year, $26M deal, with 7M in dead space if cut after 18.  That contract was structured so we could cut Matt after 2 years with very little pain...of if you want it in real terms...exactly the opposite of how Hurney normally structures his contracts.

Hurney would have back loaded the hell out of Matt's contract and we would truly be fuged.  He still has time to do that unfortunately.  The man is a lose cannon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

There have been several times when commentators stated that Hurney was "bidding against himself".

I've never been convinced that the Falcons would have offered Johnson anywhere close to what we did.

iirc, they didn't have anywhere near the cap for it.

i also remember hurney essentially bragging that we were able to keep 20 of 22 starters from a very mediocre team near the end of his tenure.

man, that guy was all over the board trying to keep the "family" together.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...