Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vrabel, new Titans HC


top dawg

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Vrabel was also only a one year coordinator. And per the Texans beat writers, the defense got worse under his watch.

Guess the Patriots connection was important there, but again, who has left New England and been any good?

As I've said they are the Titanic. It will probably end in disaster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Vrabel was also only a one year coordinator. And per the Texans beat writers, the defense got worse under his watch.

Guess the Patriots connection was important there, but again, who has left New England and been any good?

Losing Bouye, Watt, Mercilus couldn’t have helped that defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, theballboy said:

Agree. Vrabel was very overrated. Not sure why some media were making him out to be much better than he was. 

Im a guy who believes that the NFL should get rid of the Rooney Rule, but then these stuffs happen. This is a perfect example why the Rooney Rule wont go away. And Im not pointing out hiring HCs based on color alone. Other guys that have the resume’ to be HC will never get a look bc of teams hiring guys based off coaching tree and family tree. 

What about our HC then and who he hires? He doesn't exactly hire the best and we have the entire Turner family on our staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The right answer is neither and drafting Maye with the #1 Pick of the 2024 Draft lmfao we traded away the #1 in a QB LOADED DRAFT
    • I have no idea why you are so irrationally upset about the notion that going out and spending $150 million free agency dollars on two interior offensive linemen could be construed as a panic response after our #1 pick we traded a fortune for had one of the worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years. It is objectively what transpired. Dan Morgan as of right now is a mixed bag. Some really good some so so some not so good some bad some really bad. You take any rational criticism personally like you are related to him or something. That's something you'll have to figure out for yourself. Anyways. The predicament Dan Morgan finds himself in for this year will define his future as GM. I sincerely hope he navigates it to perfection. But the circumstances are largely of his own creation. And not just in his stint as GM but going back to his time as assistant GM. Which conveniently people like yourself don't like to talk about. That is the reality of the situation. I like how you will carry water for Dan Morgan to the point of getting into random spats with people but make no mention of Bryce Young's glaring limitations and shortcomings as a starting QB yet go out of your way to put the onus of our struggles squarely on Canales. I mean I've been quite critical of Canales too but he sure isn't the only one to blame for our problems.
    • They weren't well thought out. We needed one, not both. 2 top center/guard candidates were going to be available in the 2nd. We would have been fine with JPJ or Frazier. Drafting either over XL or Brooks would have made perfect sense. Hell, drafting both would have made sense even if we had signed Lewis or Hunt. Instead we drafted a 1 year wonder project WR and a luxury RB that we didn't need since we had Hubbard. Draft IOL, pay tackles. Plenty of 2nd round guards and centers start immediately and play very well. Those 2 picks were not good then, now, no matter how much explaining anyone tries to do. Several of called it then. 
×
×
  • Create New...