Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lower concession prices...Higher profits?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I sent this exact feedback to "Spectrum Center" last time I went to an event there. Prices were so high on everything in the arena the we opted to only buy a drink each and just not partake in anything else. I'd have been fine spending money but there was no value in what we were purchasing and it was totally cost prohibitive. If they would lower prices we would have spent far more than we did and likely enjoyed ourselves more. Plus, if you get folks drinking the purse strings tend to loosen up a bit more. But at $10-15 per BEER we weren't enticed to purchase anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah I never really understood the movie popcorn theory. The more affordable you make something the more people buy. 

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bigpoppa said:

There was an interesting segment on the show Brain Games about that one time. They had a showing of a movie one night and had only small and medium popcorn. The small was $3 and the large was something like $7. The first night almost everyone bought the small. Then the second night they added a large for $8. The second night almost everyone bought a large. That perceived value of the large over the medium effectively tricked people into thinking it was a value to pay $9 for something that would cost them less than a dollar to make at home.

Well yes playing on stupid people has always worked. Like. 99 instead of 1.00.

Still if you lower the total price each person buys something and doesn't share the total revenue goes up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Is this showing profits are higher or that people spent more money? Because they're different things. 

They looked at it from both sides.

Quote

One caution: Mimicking the Falcons’ concessions approach is not simply a matter of a team deciding to mark down prices. Blank and his staff did it by abandoning the traditional vendor structure and crafting an operator relationship that allowed the Falcons more control over prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These places would rather make one slow nickel than five fast pennies. And honestly as long as it takes to get through the lines now, I can't imagine how bad it would be if half the attendees weren't refusing to participate in being fleeced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...