Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To Be with Marty or Not to be With Marty...


MHS831

Marty Hurney Popularity Poll  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want Marty Hurney to be the next Panther GM?

    • Yes
      19
    • No
      157


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Time to be shocked, Nostra Dumas(s).  That is why data is far better than your suppositions and opinions.   13% so far.  Your brain has betrayed you yet again.

And, if you read your posts, you get into a discussion about  Gettlemen.  What about this poll required you to think of Gettlemen?

You see, your thinking is undisciplined because you make erroneous assumptions and can't stay focused on the topic. You think and act like a....Squirrel!!!

image.png.791e9fd895995f4220b7aba40e240218.png

We lost you.

I'm shock Hurney has this much support here.. But at least half those votes are trolls .. But 5 votes is way more than I thought he get... 

Oh shove that high horse up your a$$ prick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see someone better than either Hurney or Gettleman get hired.  Can everyone get behind that at least?

I am curious about one thing.  Assuming we hire a GM in March, do y'all think Hurney will be kept on in an advisory role through April so he can help with the draft?  I think that it would make sense, given the work that has likely been done on it already, but I'm not sure what an incoming Gm would want to do.  And would Hurney even want to do that?  His contract runs through June, for what it's worth.  

The other thought I have is that the user who suggested that the new owner would likely want to choose his/her own GM made a good point.  Given that, I would not be surprised at all to see the actual hire delayed until the new Owners are identified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

I would like to see someone better than either Hurney or Gettleman get hired.  Can everyone get behind that at least?

I am curious about one thing.  Assuming we hire a GM in March, do y'all think Hurney will be kept on in an advisory role through April so he can help with the draft?  I think that it would make sense, given the work that has likely been done on it already, but I'm not sure what an incoming Gm would want to do.  And would Hurney even want to do that?  His contract runs through June, for what it's worth.  

The other thought I have is that the user who suggested that the new owner would likely want to choose his/her own GM made a good point.  Given that, I would not be surprised at all to see the actual hire delayed until the new Owners are identified.

Maybe he can have Morrison old job while in a advisory role.. That sounds like a good plan to help a already shaky transition..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Close your pie hole when grown folks are talking boy...

You don't have enough posting credential to have a opinion clown...

Close your pie hole when grown folks are talking, boy*

You don't have enough posting credentials to have an opinion, clown*

 

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Based on  a story that's come out in recent weeks, that may not actually be true.

Kind of moot at this point, though.

That story indicated JR understood someone needed to be held accountable for the failure to field a winning team for four years straight.  JR's instincts were supposedly to fire Rivera, but Marty offered to fall on his sword instead.  Ultimately, it was JR's decision to make and he chose Marty.

That might have been the last good decision JR ever made as owner other than to sell the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I'm shock Hurney has this much support here.. But at least half those votes are trolls .. But 5 votes is way more than I thought he get... 

Oh shove that high horse up your a$$ prick...

The bold font is yet another example of an unsubstantiated, erroneous assumption you make and present as a fact, even deriving an actual, concrete number on which to continue your complete lack of most all forms of logic and intelligence. 

You called this thread stupid and meaningless, yet spend 2 days and about 25 posts trying to discredit it.   Interesting.  Stupid threads must attract you like a moth to a floodlight.

Now you are mad and have resorted to name calling.  Don't be upset with me, be angry at your inabilities to understand that others may have differing opinions and that statistical data often proves that you are pretty damn idiotic.  No charge for this feedback, just regroup and find another purpose in life.  This one is not working well for you.

You should also know that you can sue your public school system for malpractice.  You have a compelling case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...