Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Norwell exits, enter Moton?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

So,  Bill Voth thinks Norwell is gone and that no tag is forthcoming this year, as referenced by Tim Weaver of USA Today. But the thing that surprised me is that according to Weaver,  Taylor Moton might be the guy expected to replace him.  It might not be a bad idea.

 

"Add it all up and it sounds like the Panthers may be preparing for life after Norwell. Moton may be their last line of defense if the other candidates to replace him don’t work out.

"The good news is that it’s not fluff: Moton has experience playing guard at Western Michigan and he certainly has the requisite size."

 

And here we are thinking that maybe Moton could replace Speed Bump (one can only hope) , but it looks like the plan is to replace White Buffalo if all else fails.  

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/20/panthers-playing-up-offensive-tackle-taylor-motons-versatility/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want him on the field. He seems to have the “it” factor you look for in an offensive lineman. Size, smarts, and athleticism.

We will see where he fits...would be nice if he was a solid LT, but would rather him be at the position he thrives at...so I’d settle for a pro bowl LG over an average LT I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be for it. Slide trai over to the left to help Matt and insert Moton into RG next to Daryl. Cut Matt after this season and give some of that to Daryl. Draft a tackle in the first or second in this upcoming draft, or be active but not Santa Claus in next years FA market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of us have been saying that we expect Moton to be the front runner for the job.  Yesterday, Mr. Scott posted an article on the Panther network that featured Moton's flexibility.  In fact, I was not happy when we drafted him to be a T because all I had read projected him to G.  He supposedly (as a Jr) dominated Ohio State DTs at G and was a bit raw at T. 

I think knowing they have a good player at LG (Moton needs to play) allows them the luxury of letting Norwell go.  Not ideal, but with the cap, nothing is.

I hope we draft a LT this year.

To me, the mystery of the OL is C. We need to cut Ryan Kalil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I've been thinking about it. Moton,  Butler, Hall and Samuel should be expected to step up in a big way this year, so maybe our holes really aren't as big as some think. 

I have said that we have several players that were raw when we drafted them, making the 2017 draft limited to CMC and that is it.  It is like we are getting 2 drafts this year.  

Moton:  Raw, small school OL--needed a year.

Samuel:  RB/WR combo player who would need to develop skill set as a pure slot WR.  Then the injuries came.

Hall:  Weak.  had gone from a string bean to a tall, lean athlete, but needed a year or even 2 of strength training and technique before he would be ready. He will play a bigger role this year--if in this draft (2018), Hall would be a second rounder without a doubt.

Armah: Played several positions in college and was very raw.  I think he could be a bigger asset in 2018---and a weapon in the passing game.

Elder:  Corn is a small nickel who was IR'd early.  He is confident, aggressive, etc.  expecting big things.

So yeah, we get these players.  Moton and Hall are the wildcards---we need them to step up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moton is intriguing as a G or C.  I never thought he had the agility / feet to play outside, but some of the tape on him from earlier in his college career he looked really strong inside.  I think some others have mentioned how he was able to handle some quality college DT's as a G.

I had actually never considered him as a C, but there are a lot of folks who think he's got good football intelligence - and that's one of the things that sets a good C apart from a good G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So,  Bill Voth thinks Norwell is gone and that no tag is forthcoming this year, as referenced by Tim Weaver of USA Today. But the thing that surprised me is that according to Weaver,  Taylor Moton might be the guy expected to replace him.  It might not be a bad idea.

 

"Add it all up and it sounds like the Panthers may be preparing for life after Norwell. Moton may be their last line of defense if the other candidates to replace him don’t work out.

"The good news is that it’s not fluff: Moton has experience playing guard at Western Michigan and he certainly has the requisite size."

 

And here we are thinking that maybe Moton could replace Speed Bump (one can only hope) , but it looks like the plan is to replace White Buffalo if all else fails.  

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/20/panthers-playing-up-offensive-tackle-taylor-motons-versatility/

 

Nope Moton to the Center is the most likely scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So,  Bill Voth thinks Norwell is gone and that no tag is forthcoming this year, as referenced by Tim Weaver of USA Today. But the thing that surprised me is that according to Weaver,  Taylor Moton might be the guy expected to replace him.  It might not be a bad idea.

 

"Add it all up and it sounds like the Panthers may be preparing for life after Norwell. Moton may be their last line of defense if the other candidates to replace him don’t work out.

"The good news is that it’s not fluff: Moton has experience playing guard at Western Michigan and he certainly has the requisite size."

 

And here we are thinking that maybe Moton could replace Speed Bump (one can only hope) , but it looks like the plan is to replace White Buffalo if all else fails.  

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/20/panthers-playing-up-offensive-tackle-taylor-motons-versatility/

 

Does anyone know if we tag him and he still walks next season do we forfeit the comp pick or do we still get one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes. Fitt said he liked Young for two years. He hitched his wagon to him. Reich and Young were going 2-15, nothing I said we should get would have saved him. A new coach plus Tepper (and Morgan) would have wanted the draft assets we kept or got to be used by a better GM/Coach. SMH, you need to read my post and your own again. You said: “So we should have sold off all of our talent and what?” I was being sarcastic that they still were in the roster because the guys you are saying we shouldn’t have sold off got sold off anyway but instead of getting full value, we got scraps. We had an opportunity to sell at the highs and instead we let the stocks lose 50-75% and then sold them. Because we didn’t tank in 2022 when the Rams basically handed the idea to us, we either set the team back several years to where we won’t do anything and will be back at the drawing board or kept enough talent off the team that we may make the playoffs but we still won’t be a top team like an extra handful of 1st rounders could have gotten us.
    • Holy poo... we have allowed the fewest goals in the playoffs, total. Including the teams that lost in the first round... lmao
    • It was nothing. It was a nice run in an easy schedule that did nothing but lose us DJ Moore and a lot more. We were 2-15 in 2023. Based on your logic, that winning finish should have been a launching point. For as much as you want to say we shouldn’t have taken a risk, you still can’t admit that the plans we tankers laid out were proven correct. There’s no revisionist history. We said we should have traded Burns to the Rams. We said we should have sold off anything not bolted down like Brown and Horn and even Icky because they were in the 5 year plan. There is no disconnect, we tried to keep winning and draft a rookie QB and we lost about 4 1st round picks of value that could have been given to the guys you think might be the right crew.
×
×
  • Create New...