Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For Those who suspect an Edge Rusher in the First


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Clear as day last year after passing on Barnett at 8 this would be the predicament.

Thank goodness for the Richmond Roughriders-signing Hardy and absorbing meaningless bad PR by allowing him to destroy the Arena League on good behavior.  That and the new owner-bringing Kraken home before kickoff 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

Walterfootball is not the best place to get info. Also this draft is terrible at edge rusher... value just isn’t there in the first. That said he is rated a late first but with the lack of pass rusher he will get pushed up and will got before 17.

Agree on both counts.  But the content is coming from scouts he surveyed at the combine, supposedly.

This is not going to win me friends,  but I think if we sign Peppers, we are good to go at DE...Peppers and Addison, Horton and Hall, then Cox.  You have to develop the young guys,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

It seems like every year  DEs are automatically better than any other position because of the name.

 

B.S.there are TEs definitely better than this guy that should be taken at 24 .

What TEs?  I will bet you that no TE goes before this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...