Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A-Rob, Watkins? Not likely. The money is looking just too funny

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

It's all nice and great to think about making a realistic run at a top free agent wide receiver, but if I had to bet on it, I would say it's a pipe dream of the highest order.  Sure,  some of you want to take what Voth says about it as being "actually realistic" and make it more than it is,  but the fact is that with our budget and holes,  it's actually unrealistic. Unless Marty basically says "fug it and let the chips fall where they may," I can't see us making a serious push.  

Tim Weaver of USA Today points to the cold hard truth.

 

"...With $157 million in salaries already used up for 2018, this leaves the team with $23 million in cap room. Subtract $7-8 million for the rookie contracts and that leaves approximately $15 million to play around with for next season."

 

"Having potentially less than $15 million to utilize for this year, it seems unlikely the team will go after a notable free agent receiver such as Jacksonville’s Allen Robinson or the Rams’ Sammy Watkins, unless the Panthers make a move such as releasing Ryan Kalil or Russell Shepard. As in years past with Dave Gettleman, it’s likely the team opts to fill holes with cheap veterans like Mike Adams, who was signed last year to fill out the strong safety position."

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/03/07/panthers-2018-salary-cap-update-how-much-room-do-they-have/

 

Now you know that we want Pep back, and there is the rumor that we want to upgrade the backup QB position. Where do y'all think that all this money is coming from? 

It's kind of ironic that people essentially want Hurney to make it rain when that's what got him fired the first time.  Some are even suggesting that he's going to go all-in because he is under some imaginary gun of a new owner that has yet to be named.  I just don't believe that Hurney is going to throw caution to the wind and neglect fiscal responsibility.  Now what I do think is that he may decide to make a go of it, having faith that he can deal with whatever weaknesses that exist (or continue to exist) via a strong draft,  and a strong belief that development of younger pieces already on the roster may have to suffice.  I mean,  we'll still have KK,  Addison and our linebackers to hopefully stop outrageous bleeding,  and that maybe with the addition of a Robinson or Watkins will simply help us to overpower people offensively.  But, really,  I just can't see him doing that.  

He may not have to go to Dollar Tree,  but it's looking like finding values at Walmart is definitely in order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
Posted

I don't remember what thread maybe one of the Gano ones but it was posted in there we had around 23 million after the Gano contract and that already took into account money for rookies. Why is the exact cap space always so difficult to figure out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted
Just now, Eazy-E said:

I don't remember what thread maybe one of the Gano ones but it was posted in there we had around 23 million after the Gano contract and that already took into account money for rookies. Why is the exact cap space always so difficult to figure out?

Just go to this site bro

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted

FA hasn't even started and people are already saying what FA's are unlikely. This fanbase can be depressing at times. At least let the first few days of FA play out. Lets see if we can secure a meeting with one of the top WR's. If Hurney shows them a plan, maybe we can get them for a little less than what the Bears/49ers/Browns/Colts can offer.

 

#Believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Trill OG said:

FA hasn't even started and people are already saying what FA's are unlikely. This fanbase can be depressing at times. At least let the first few days of FA play out. Lets see if we can secure a meeting with one of the top WR's. If Hurney shows them a plan, maybe we can get them for a little less than what the Bears/49ers/Browns/Colts can offer.

 

#Believe

For me,  being realistic here is not being depressing, it's just being real and in touch with reality. 

I'd still be pleased with Donte Moncrief, Jeremy Maclin,  Mike Wallace,  Paul Richardson,  Marquise Lee,  and whoever else.  

Set your expectations in fitting with reality and be contented with that,  and then if something more happens, be ecstatic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trill OG Newbie

Trill OG

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

For me,  being realistic here is not being depressing.  

I'd still be pleased with Donte Moncrief, Jeremy Maclin,  Mike Wallace,  Paul Richardson,  Marquise Lee,  and whoever else.  

Set your expectations in fitting with reality and be contented with that,  and then if something more happens, be ecstatic. 

Oh im not talking about me. Im speaking for others who believe we have a realistic shot at getting a top WR. It's not unrealistic as you say. If teams like the Saints/Falcons can continue to get talent with little cap space, why can't we?

Im all for Mike Wallace, but why not aim higher?

 

All im saying is don't say something is unrealistic until the process starts. Give us a chance to get one of these guys in a meeting. Believe it or not, Cam Newton is going to be a huge selling point to these top WR's. Cam is the best of the bunch considering what teams need WR's Jimmy G is good, but he doesn't have a long resume of being great. Luck/Tribuski/Browns #1 Qb is not competing with Cam Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By CRA · Posted

      Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • frankw
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By frankw · Posted

      Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • ForJimmy
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...