Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Paul Richardson likely to sign w/Redskins


dldove77

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

The point is, the Eagles got their young QB weapons, and it worked.     You fix the issues you have in FA if possible, and they won a SB.    Though like I said, I agree you don't give up everything but sometimes you have to look past bargain bin trash and get a proven player.    Look back at the past 15 years and our WR's we've given Cam and our QBs...... it's pretty terrible.   

Well to be fair, when Cam was on his rookie deal we had good success with building a strong overall team from a CAP perspective. A lot of these teams dropping big contracts are doing so with QBs on their rookie deals. Or just not $21M tied up in one player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JustAQuestion said:

What if Ted Ginn didn't want to come back to Charlotte? It takes two to tango, and he wanted a better-throwing quarterback.

i think if that guy says it 100 more times he thinks it might come undone. but yes, i think he likes his passes in front of him so he can catch and run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Peppers90 NC said:

yes, yes we do. look at all the kickers and screamers on this message board. we also have the most babies.

Yeah biggest babies. Look at other teams drafts when they draft a QB, they load their drafts with weapons. We didn't draft a single offensive player until the 7th round during Cams. We have not given Cam one single legitimate WR during his tenure here.

we don't want to spend over $10 mil in free agent on top WR FA. We don't want to spend 6-8 mil on the next tier WR FA. We don't want to use top picks on wide receivers. So the team isn't willing to do anything, but expects different results. Pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JustAQuestion said:

What if Ted Ginn didn't want to come back to Charlotte? It takes two to tango, and he wanted a better-throwing quarterback.

As far as I can tell that isn't what happened. We made him an offer and he got a better offer from NO. We refused to budge and didn't think he was worth it (lol) so he took the Saints offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

Well to be fair, when Cam was on his rookie deal we had good success with building a strong overall team from a CAP perspective. A lot of these teams dropping big contracts are doing so with QBs on their rookie deals. Or just not $21M tied up in one player. 

Cam's deal right now is a BARGAIN though.

10 minutes ago, JustAQuestion said:

What if Ted Ginn didn't want to come back to Charlotte? It takes two to tango, and he wanted a better-throwing quarterback.

I didn't hear any of the sort, Ginn loved it here, would have stayed, I mean he came back after Arizona.

7 minutes ago, JustAQuestion said:

Steve Smith

He didn't draft Smith.    I think the realistic answer is actually Lafell.     Hurney SUCKS at drafting WRs..... that's why we need to look outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JustAQuestion said:

Steve Smith

apparently that was a tense moment in the war room

hurney knew that it takes two to tango, and he wasn't sure if steve smith wanted to be here.  utah is a long way away from north carolina.  but they turned the pick in anyway, and they made the phone call.  it turns out steve was thinking the exact same thing; he wanted to come to carolina, but he wasn't sure if carolina wanted him there.  then him and hurney said "it takes two to tango" at the same time and they both laughed uproariously.  it was truly the start of a beautiful relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JustAQuestion said:

It's going to become more important to have two-way players to save on the cap. If you can get guys like Bradberry to play WR and Smith to play CB, you're solid. Works at the high school level.

I actually enjoy this alt-account, keep up the good work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...