Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN's Todd McShay's 2018 NFL Draft 4-round mock draft spectacular


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Never heard of those guys listed after Moore. That could easily end up being a terrible draft if Moore busts

Heres a much better draft using that same 1st round pick : 

Round 1 Pick 24:  Moore, DJ, WR, Maryland (A)
Round 2 Pick 23:  Reid, Justin, FS, Stanford (A-)
Round 3 Pick 21:  Michel, Sony, RB, Georgia (A+)
Round 3 Pick 24:  Hurst, Hayden, TE, South Carolina (A+)
Round 5 Pick 24:  Hill, Holton, CB, Texas (A+)
Round 6 Pick 23:  Ateman, Marcell, WR, Oklahoma State (A+)
Round 7 Pick 16:  Adams, Tony, OG, North Carolina State (A+)
Round 7 Pick 24:  Flowers, Tre, SS, Oklahoma State (A+)

Dream scenario...but a dream.  Sony in the 3rd.  No.  Ateman is gonna go much earlier than people think.  I would take this predraft in a second.

That Texas CB Hill is a really good player and has all the numbers but I wouldn't pick him.  Really suspect character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

If thi I a draft that that causes us to be 8-8 what combination of first year players drive us to a winning record?  

 

Not neccesarily arguing but but would love to understand the logic behind this. 

Plain and simple this draft is giving you the opportunity..  To leave with a starting CB and Safety backups at TE and RB and a either developmental DE or WR..(Rather DE) Maybe both if lucky ..  If we are smart this is a easy draft to fix the secondary for years to come and hopefully build some depth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

Man, that is a strong statement.  Solid is IMO a solid comment.  He is ok in a group of ok guys.  That mock is bad.  I would be so fuggin upset with that shet.

I don’t know if u are a UNC fan but Stewart has been one of the bright spots for Carolina on defense the past couple of years. Heels’ defense is terrible and neglected by Fedora, not to mention the entire team was ravaged by injuries last year and the defense as a unit was giving up yards by the hundreds. Him in the third round though does seem a bit high but maybe he did well at the combine? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Never heard of those guys listed after Moore. That could easily end up being a terrible draft if Moore busts

Heres a much better draft using that same 1st round pick : 

Round 1 Pick 24:  Moore, DJ, WR, Maryland (A)
Round 2 Pick 23:  Reid, Justin, FS, Stanford (A-)
Round 3 Pick 21:  Michel, Sony, RB, Georgia (A+)
Round 3 Pick 24:  Hurst, Hayden, TE, South Carolina (A+)
Round 5 Pick 24:  Hill, Holton, CB, Texas (A+)
Round 6 Pick 23:  Ateman, Marcell, WR, Oklahoma State (A+)
Round 7 Pick 16:  Adams, Tony, OG, North Carolina State (A+)
Round 7 Pick 24:  Flowers, Tre, SS, Oklahoma State (A+)

This is probably my personal favorite mock that I have seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It amuses me when people like to make fun of the experts for not picking the correct player in each round.  There are too many variables and too many players for anyone to do that.  One team picking someone different in the first round can have a ripple affect throughout the draft.

What you should look for is the "experts" who get the players in the correct range.

Also every year it seems like fans of every team end up concentrating on the same group of players, usually those that measure really well at the combine.  Then everyone is disappointed when players are drafted by their team that nobody has every heard of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 4Corners said:

I don’t know if u are a UNC fan but Stewart has been one of the bright spots for Carolina on defense the past couple of years. Heels’ defense is terrible and neglected by Fedora, not to mention the entire team was ravaged by injuries last year and the defense as a unit was giving up yards by the hundreds. Him in the third round though does seem a bit high but maybe he did well at the combine? 

Yeah Heels fan and LB Smith and Stewart were probably the best defenders for us but Stewart is solid like you said but not sure he is NFL talent.  Hope I am wrong. Kiper loves him for what its worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yeah Heels fan and LB Smith and Stewart were probably the best defenders for us but Stewart is solid like you said but not sure he is NFL talent.  Hope I am wrong. Kiper loves him for what its worth.

Stewart and Mike Hughes could have been a great tandem for us. Hughes has popped up in a  few mocks in the first round. Speaking of Smith, I was a bit surprised he left early but about a 2-3 weeks before the deadline to declare, he tweeted out an idiotic comment asking for money because he was a broke college student, which I’m pretty sure in an NCAA violation and I’m sure caused a 45 page thread about it on packpride. UNC defense could be a disaster next year as well but I’m to the point now with Fedora that I’m almost willing to take another horrible season if that means he will be fired after next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

It amuses me when people like to make fun of the experts for not picking the correct player in each round.  There are too many variables and too many players for anyone to do that.  One team picking someone different in the first round can have a ripple affect throughout the draft.

What you should look for is the "experts" who get the players in the correct range.

Also every year it seems like fans of every team end up concentrating on the same group of players, usually those that measure really well at the combine.  Then everyone is disappointed when players are drafted by their team that nobody has every heard of.

Mel Kiper, Todd McShay, and people like Kevin Weidel on WFNZ are not experts. Please don’t confuse a person with no NFL front office experience &  no NFL playing experience as experts. If any of them knew what they were talking about, they would be working for an NFL organization. 

They are opinion makers, who are paid to work for a media outlet to stir the pot, provide an opinion to generate content. They are no different than Joe Lunardi. They parachute in two weeks before the draft/bracket give a bunch of hot takes and provide opinion and get people talking about their event.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...