Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Morgri's Mock (only Mock)


Jaxel

Recommended Posts

I do one Mock each year... Seem's to be about that time.

While Safety is important, I don't think Ron Rivera and his staff value it enough to pick on in the first round. Cornerback, however, has been a thorn in their side for years, and they have, contrary to popular thought put a lot of assets into the corner position. Hurney also draft Gamble in the first round many years ago, so he isn't afraid to take a shot at a first round corner.

1. Mike Hughes - Offers solid corner skills as well as strong return skills, allowing us to keep CMC, who is a great returner, off special teams and in a primary roll as a RB.

2. Rashaad Penny - No one values the run attack more than Rivera and Hurney. Our offense has been run first since 1995 and that not changing. As good as CAP can be, the staff does not trust him in games and I don't see that changing. Penny is as solid in between tackler as you can find in this draft, and may not even be here at this pick.

3. Jessie Bates - Now Rivera and Hurney invest in the safety. A good enough player to start, but will probably rotate with the veteran Searcy as the starter and be groomed for the long term starter role.

3-2. Desean Hamilton - A great route runner that offers insurance should Samuels not be ready for the season. Can play inside and out and offers a great option on third downs. Knows how to get open in zone coverage, which leads to high percentage of first downs on his catches.

5. DE

6. LB

7. TE

Thanks for taking a read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Isaac said:

My only argument is drafting people based on "return skills" value is becoming irrelevant, as the NFL is phasing out returns because of the danger with concussions.

which sucks and almost makes special teams useless. the 2005 bears would be ashamed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...