Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Defence wont be top half this year - convince me otherwise


Recommended Posts

Outside of 2016 - the year of Cam and Luke's injuries, our defense has been top 10 since 2012.

Up until last year this was a result of being able to get pressure with 4 up front, stopping the run, having an average secondary in a tight "bend but don't break" zone scheme and using elite linebacker play to clean up the middle of the field. 

But, I reckon there's one reason as important as all of these that may change this year and have a pretty fundamental impact on our defense. 

Time of possession. 

Since 2013 our time of possession rankings have been 4th, 2nd, 1st, 7th, 2nd. In that time our defensive rankings: 3rd, 6th, 4th, 21st, 9th. The correlation in this case could prove causality. 

You could say that TOP could be linked to our defensive strength and getting opponents off the field quicker. I don't think this has really been the case apart from 2015 where we had a massive turnover differential. 

Of all Shula's faults, I've always argued his biggest impact was on our defense. Its still a stupid thing to consider from your OC, but by slowing the game down and stubbornly leaning on your run game, we managed to keep our defense fresh when it mattered, and kept opposing QBs off the field. 

With a new OC, new DC, re-worked secondary and less depth at DE/LB I have serious doubts about our defense being in the top half of the league this year. Let's hope our offense picks up the slack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me... what group would you rather have:

1) Bradberry, Worley, Munnerlyn, Seymour, Gunter

2) Bradberry, Jackson, Cockrell, Seymour, Elder

Assuming we pick up a starting caliber safety by the beginning of the year, I think we will be alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

Tell me... what group would you rather have:

1) Bradberry, Worley, Munnerlyn, Seymour, Gunter

2) Bradberry, Jackson, Cockrell, Seymour, Elder

Assuming we pick up a starting caliber safety by the beginning of the year, I think we will be alright.

I don’t think either of these are filling OCs with fear...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely Bradberry won’t repeat last years awfulness and at worst Searcy is a decent upgrade over the Coleman of last year. Jackson has to be better than the scrubs we were forced to play last year. Hopefully a redshirted Hall is ready to contribute and Butler stays healthy finally. Poe should be an upgrade over Star as a pass rusher. Wilks was pretty bad as a DC. Once teams got him dialed they lit us up. I can’t see Washington doing worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 was the year we were forced to start 2 rookies at CB.  Combine that with a wicked SB hangover and you can see why the defense suffered.  I expect this group, even with a serious question mark at safety, can be top 15.

of course injuries could quickly change expectations, but that is true of any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...