Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston has talked with Panthers' front office

TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Swaggasaurus Experienced

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted

I don’t know that we do anything at S. I see us going with Gaulden, Adams, Scearcy, and Jones.

 

If we add someone via FA or cuts more likely it will be Fozzy Whitaker’s replacement at RB. Having CAP and Samuel means Fozzy isn’t needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Mentor

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

I don’t know that we do anything at S. I see us going with Gaulden, Adams, Scearcy, and Jones.

 

If we add someone via FA or cuts more likely it will be Fozzy Whitaker’s replacement at RB. Having CAP and Samuel means Fozzy isn’t needed. 

This would be a disaster IMO. 

Adams is serviceable but each year longer in the league, he becomes more of a liability and needs a partner to cover his flaws.

Searcy is a 7 year younger Adams....same issue. Good guy if he has a better compliment beside him.

Jones is a ST player and maybe an occasional sub-package DB....he scares me when I see him on the field.

Gaulden is a late third-round rookie that is seen equally as much as a corner as a safety. I do think he will be a good safety in time, but not in year one. 

Bottom line is we need to get Eric Reid, Kenny Vaccarro, Tre Boston or kick the tires in Seattle on Earl Thomas trade. It would probably cost us a 2nd next year, but to add one of the league's best safeties to a promising Gaulden and young CBs like Bradberry, Jackson, Cockrell, Elder and Seymour is the kind of move that SB contending teams make. Doubt he actually gets traded, and I wouldn't want to give up a 2nd round pick, but man.....Earl roaming our secondary with Luke handling the guys up front would be a beautiful thing.

I do agree adding a RB is equally as important, so an Orleans Darkwa, CJ Anderson, Morris or even West signing makes a ton of sense. 

Bottom line is that we are def not done yet. I think Marty lands a SAF and a RB and roles the dice on Moton being the answer at LG, with maybe Larsen and Sriles getting the next crack in camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...