Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Body Mass and Acceleration.


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

Happy Friday eve, all!

 

Yesterday a thread went on lock down due to some lackluster comments with some harsh responses. The heated debate was whether adding “mass” would make an athlete less agile/speedy.

 

I am here to argue that when the “right” mass is added to the frame of an athlete that is extra mass is neglible.

 

The game of football is a game of short, explosive plays, lasting only a few seconds at a time. Therefore, ideally we would like our atheletes to be able to perform as such. There is no need for these gentleman to perform for hours at a time without rest in between plays. Players should be able to produce quick, explosive movements, in a relatively short amount of time. We are talking seconds, people!

 

“Because the sprinter only has to perform a couple of seconds, the added weight is trivial. “

 

 

The video above has a wonderful breakdown of body types of different styled athletes of similar sports. Whilst NFL athletes are not “sprinters” (not all at least) the same anatomical and physiological rules apply. 

 

Obviously everyone has their optimal body mass to quickness ratio but my argument is that the amount of mass added with the return “loss” in quickness is indeed trivial. These athletes perform sport-specific exercises and lifting to improve every aspect of their game including quickness and adding a few pounds of pure type 2b fibers are not going to get in the way of a few seconds of on the field performance.

 

Thoughts? I welcome a good clean debate.

 

Signed,

A Doctor of Physical Therapy. Expert in human movement. YouTube extraordinare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe you Warheel. It just makes sense, but...from a purely logical standpoint, I could see where adding 20 pounds on a wide receiver going 50 yards could make a difference that is seemingly negligible, but remember that other athletes are trying to optimize their bodies also. It seems to me that it all depends on the individual. Some can handle more, or less, and be affected positively, negatively or not at all by varying degrees. So I don't think it's a cookie cutter approach, and it would seem like there has to be a certain amount of guess work just like in medical practice in general. That's why they call it "practice." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the video, and watched it because it was short.  I don't understand why you feel the need to engage on this topic though.  I really doubt that anyone who's interested in training or an honest discussion on the impacts of bulking up is going to pay attention to what that other person had to say.  Hell, in some cases bulking up can make you faster.  But what do I know, I'm an endurance guy. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

What abou endurance? How does that extra mass weigh down a player over the entire course of a game? 

Two types of Type II fibers. A and B. A are built for more endurance and B and quick and explosive fibers that fatigue quickly. Football atheletes would do well to have a combination of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was WOW who showed his ass and made it personal--but he has a point.  When the microwave  bell rings, the bigger he gets the longer it takes him to get up the stairs and reach the Hot Pocket his mom made for him from his cozy lair in her basement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cyberjag said:

I appreciate the video, and watched it because it was short.  I don't understand why you feel the need to engage on this topic though.  I really doubt that anyone who's interested in training or an honest discussion on the impacts of bulking up is going to pay attention to what that other person had to say.  Hell, in some cases bulking up can make you faster.  But what do I know, I'm an endurance guy. :)

No harm in throwing a little education the public’s way. Some people enjoy insight into these things and there’s nothing wrong with a friendly debate. :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

I believe you Warheel. It just makes sense, but...from a purely logical standpoint, I could see where adding 20 pounds on a wide receiver going 50 yards could make a difference that is seemingly negligible, but remember that other athletes are trying to optimize their bodies also. It seems to me that it all depends on the individual. Some can handle more, or less, and be affected positively, negatively or not at all by varying degrees. So I don't think it's a cookie cutter approach, and it would seem like there has to be a certain amount of guess work just like in medical practice in general. That's why they call it "practice." 

As stated above, there will always be an optimal mass to agility ratio. No one in their right mind is saying adding 50 lbs to a guy and expecting him to move faster is rational. But it is indeed possible to add mass and actually improve ones speed and agility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was kind of what I was trying to get at yesterday. It's a lot more complex than just making a broad and absolute statement. The kind of muscle that is being added matters, body mass conversion matters, etc, etc. Thanks WarHeel for steering this in a more reasoned and fact based debate(which I was trying to do with the locked thread).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an interesting side note to the topic... My son was invited to Western Carolina's football prospect Junior day a couple of weeks ago. They have software built into their weight stations that measures power, strength and quickness, and tracks all the stations simultaneously. The athletes compete against each other while lifting to see who has the best combination of speed, strength, and power. The weight coach described what they do to maximize each athletes speed, strength and power. Said that it wasn't just about one - they had to be great in all areas. Certainly a lot different than when I was in school. Here's a pic. Hope it works. My 1st time trying to upload a pic.

IMG_1350 (002).jpg

IMG_1350 (002).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
    • Shannon was sued for $50 million (settled out of court, I believe) for forcing sex on his girlfriend during a two-year relationship.  He denies it, but ESPN let him go last April.  Chad Johnson's wife filed a police report because he head-butted her in a car and was put on probation. I had to google it.  I watched the Ray Rice video and when you see it, you realize just how vile and cowardly abusing a woman really is.  But for the same point Aussie tried to make, these women are defenseless, and being phyiscally bigger and stronger does not validate your actions.   I can't even stand to watch Steve Smith.  I can't normalize this kind of behavior--again, I do not think R-P had that in mind when he posted this.  When the reason was exposed, we should realize that we are talking life (quality of) and death (in some cases) here.  
×
×
  • Create New...