Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper committed to CLT; "at least one finalist had eyes on stadium in SC"


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Per @RapSheet

Assuming that'd be Navarro in which case glad he didn't get the team.

Navarro wanted to keep BOA.

LaCanfora reported that one of the reasons Tepper placed a lower bid was that he didn't like the stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Navarro wanted to keep BOA.

LaCanfora reported that one of the reasons Tepper placed a lower bid was that he didn't like the stadium.

If there's a discrepancy in reporting between Rapoport and La Canfora, go with Rapoport every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

No argument on that.

Guess what I mean is: you can pretty much throw out what La Canfora said about which guy wanted which improvements to the stadium. If Tepper doesn't want the stadium in SC, that leaves us with Navarro, Kestenbaum, or Rubin. Which of those makes the most sense to you? Keep in mind that Kestenbaum and Rubin seem to have faded away weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Marcogreenbush said:

South Carolina sucks ! Only thing they got going for them is myrtle beach , I like myrtle beach , other then that North Carolina is the better state in general . I like our location 

I doubt a SC move meant something like Charleston or Columbia. Probably more like Fort Mill or Indian Land. Still, that would have sucked so hard compared to having one in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ECUPantherFan said:

Ugh.  South Carolina.  

I would love to hear the proposed locations in SC.  The only one that would make sense would be Fort Mill.

I am guessing Florence.  They have a booming paper mill there and  their Motel 6 is quite nice.  Seriously, there is nowhere in SC that makes sense.  I did like the idea of a stadium on the line--if ever a new stadium situation comes up as before, they would have to actually pay something for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...