Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 6 WRs


Recommended Posts

After looking at the Roster I can see us keeping 6 WR with Byrd as our PR/WR.

Funchess, Moore, Samuel, Smith, Wright being the primary WRs. 

If we only keep 5 do we cut Wright or Byrd.  I think the other 4 are fairly safe.

Do any of the others really have a legitimate shot of replacing Wright or Bryd or are they just camp fodder?

What a difference over a year ago.  I really like those six players and gives Turner the opportunity to do some really interesting things.

Thoughts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think half the board is high on Byrd the other half wasn’t as impressed with him due to the small sample size. I think Damiere  just needs to stay healthy. If he has prepared for a rigorous season the way he should by possibly putting on a few pound of muscle/mass I am definitely on the we need to keep him train. He was to valuable in the games he played to cut him or let him walk. We saw the importance of needing depth last year. Since Samuel and Byrd are slight in frame I think keeping 6 guys is important but at the same time that’s why we have OTAs and training camp. All 6 should be able to show if they belong in Norvs offense. 

 

I just hope Rivera stays out of Norvs way. He needs to spend his time in the secondary meeting rooms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Beast_3000 said:

I think half the board is high on Byrd the other half wasn’t as impressed with him due to the small sample size. I think Damiere  just needs to stay healthy. If he has prepared for a rigorous season the way he should by possibly putting on a few pound of muscle/mass I am definitely on the we need to keep him train. He was to valuable in the games he played to cut him or let him walk. We saw the importance of needing depth last year. Since Samuel and Byrd are slight in frame I think keeping 6 guys is important but at the same time that’s why we have OTAs and training camp. All 6 should be able to show if they belong in Norvs offense. 

 

5'11" and 200lbs isn't exactly slight of frame. If that's the case, a lot of guys are including OBJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside the Philly Brown punt return for a touchdown and that was more of a gaff than a great return.

When was the last time we scored a TD off a punt return?  Byrd return last year was outstanding and we are crazy not to keep him as a PR.   that is why I feel Wright is the odd man out if we stick with only 5 WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, top dawg said:

5'11" and 200lbs isn't exactly slight of frame. If that's the case, a lot of guys are including OBJ.

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Byrd is practice squad material. He's the reason we went out and got receivers because we don't need clay and byrd playing receiver. Rivera only ever keeps 5 WR. Byrd will have his chance if someone gets hurt, which i'm still banking on Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ARSEN said:

Not way Wright is getting cut.  He’s above average slot WR.

We also paid him $2 million up front and he's the most familiar with Norv's offense. I think he is on the team, even if we have to cut Byrd. I think we keep six though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Outside the Philly Brown punt return for a touchdown and that was more of a gaff than a great return.

When was the last time we scored a TD off a punt return?  Byrd return last year was outstanding and we are crazy not to keep him as a PR.   that is why I feel Wright is the odd man out if we stick with only 5 WRs.

FYI Byrd has the KO return. Clay had the punt return. Your point about any return TDs stands though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Byrd is practice squad material. He's the reason we went out and got receivers because we don't need clay and byrd playing receiver. Rivera only ever keeps 5 WR. Byrd will have his chance if someone gets hurt, which i'm still banking on Samuel. 

Byrd has no more PS eligibility.  A lot of people don't realize this is his fourth season coming up here.  I suppose we could stash him on IR with some made up injury if we wanted, but even that wouldn't make sense since his contract is up after the season.  This needs to be the season he comes good or gets cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beast_3000 said:

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

Steve Smith was 5'9 185.... Byrd shares a similar build... yet smitty was himself injury prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beast_3000 said:

The slight of frame comment was directed more so to Damiere Byrd. He is 5’9” and probably 185. I’m assuming you are referencing to Samuel who last season had just as many injury concerns as Byrd. My point was for the team to be successful those guys have to stay healthy. 

I get what you're saying, but Samuel doesn't really have the same injury concerns as Byrd in my opinion. Samuel's only real injury was bad luck. He got his ankle rolled up. As for the hamstring, that was just the team playing it safe (much like the Giants did with OBJ his rookie year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...