Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Bradberry impressed with DJ Moore


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stirs said:

Standard answer.

YAC?  In OTA"s?

Okay, fine.  Might be all he is billed to be, but other than catching the ball well and being quick, which is good, the other stuff will have to wait

He scores every time he catches the ball in OTAs.  duh.:tongue:

seriously, I want to hear Moore say the same thing about Bberry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

The problem is , I'm not impressed with James Bradberry

What a fan.

Man, Bradberry is a zone CB by trade.  We blitzed and it put him at a disadvantage.  He was locked onto #1 WRs the whole season.  Let's give him a chance this season. 

Where was Norman after 2 years?  Where is he now?  Systems and situations matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

You could predict these replies in a second.

Wouldn't it be easier to be fans of the Saints or Falcons or Patriots for y'all?

For real....Bradberry is coming into his 3rd year and people are already trashing him? When he has played well for us? I don't get it. If you remember his freshmen year he was locking things down when he got up to speed. Then we adjusted schemes and blitzed a lot more and he had a year 2 slump ( which is very common by the way, especially with CBs because opposing have a lot more film on them now ). Now he is trash?  Please. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

What a fan.

Man, Bradberry is a zone CB by trade.  We blitzed and it put him at a disadvantage.  He was locked onto #1 WRs the whole season.  Let's give him a chance this season. 

Where was Norman after 2 years?  Where is he now?  Systems and situations matter. 

Shh. 

 

Rational take aways are not common, or welcome here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

basically bradberry hasn't lived up to his draft position and is entering a pivotal year. there are people on here who couch their criticism that way, and there are people on here for whom he will always be young, promising, and full of bright spots and potential....until he's not and they'll pretend they never fell all over themselves defending him and lashing out against others and declaring themselves the true fans. 

Like sure Josh Norman was a late bloomer, but for every norman there are 20 in Panthers history who were also late bloomers......until they never bloomed. 

It's really dumb to assume someone is going to get dramatically better just because a different player under a different DC and position coach did it once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normam made some pretty amazing plays in college and also did it in practice once he got drafted. You kinda got the sense if he could ever settle down and focus he could be a good player in the league down the road. I dont know with bradberry, nothing bout his tape was wow factor. I have no idea what he can really be good at with more experience. Thats difference to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...