Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Adams for LT to TE?


Recommended Posts

You should see what the guy looks like now. They did him a real disservice just posting the old photo.

USAToday story had an up to date shot. Talk about a transformation. If I were signing guys up for the preseason, I'd have to send him an invite. He has the football IQ and the blocking technique knowledge. Not sure how strong his receiving skills are, but worth a shot.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/steelers/2018/06/02/ex-steelers-lineman-mike-adams-trying-nfl-comeback-tight-end/666892002/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

You should see what the guy looks like now. They did him a real disservice just posting the old photo.

USAToday story had an up to date shot. Talk about a transformation. If I were signing guys up for the preseason, I'd have to send him an invite. He has the football IQ and the blocking technique knowledge. Not sure how strong his receiving skills are, but worth a shot.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/steelers/2018/06/02/ex-steelers-lineman-mike-adams-trying-nfl-comeback-tight-end/666892002/

 

If we were to give a guy a shot and it was at vet minimum with no guarantees who knows.

We have a roster spot unless it wasn't reported that we signed another player after we dropped Bannon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, bring him in and give him a try to see what he can do. This is kind of the time to be trying things like that anyhow with the "camp body" roster spots. Who knows he might have reinvented himself into a star TE or something and it wouldn't hurt to check him out at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...