Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I found a post on Reddit from a Patriots fan that made me so happy


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Patriots/comments/9ai3c7/eric_decker_announces_retirement_via_instagram/

 

Scroll about halfway down and you'll see this from a guy named roque72 that almost made me tear up: 

"I know Carolina is overloaded with receivers and will have to cut some good young guys we can take"

BB and crew are watching like a hawk as always to get our players that will be cut or on waivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

It’s true. Mose Frazier has actually looked good and god forbid we do something like cut Byrd. I can only imagine how well Byrd would do there.

Was just about to post this.  Yeah, we can't cut Byrd. He'd get signed by another team. Several teams are needy at WR.

More and more I think we start with only 2 TE in the 53 to make room for 6 WR even with extra guys on OL.

Frazier is definitely someone I could see getting picked up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s true. Mose Frazier has actually looked good and god forbid we do something like cut Byrd. I can only imagine how well Byrd would do there.

I don't even want to imagine Damiere Byrd in a Patriots jersey. God forbid we cut him, I think he would be subject to going through waivers and would be claimed well before the Pats had a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Was just about to post this.  Yeah, we can't cut Byrd. He'd get signed by another team. Several teams are needy at WR.

More and more I think we start with only 2 TE in the 53 to make room for 6 WR even with extra guys on OL.

Frazier is definitely someone I could see getting picked up. 

Nah, we start with three HB's instead of four like last year to make room. 

Manhertz, or a someone else will be the 3rd TE. 

I see CAP as a surprise cut, move Hood to the PS as ''traditional back'' insurance (5'11, 230) and have Barner and his ability behind CMC, and CJ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Nah, we start with three HB's instead of four like last year to make room. 

Manhertz, or a someone else will be the 3rd TE. 

I see CAP as a surprise cut, move Hood to the PS as ''traditional back'' insurance (5'11, 230) and have Barner and his ability behind CMC, and CJ. 

I agree with you about RBs (Barner over CAP), but I wonder if Manhertz will stay on PUP to free up roster spot early in season, then come back week 6?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KB_fan said:

I agree with you about RBs (Barner over CAP), but I wonder if Manhertz will stay on PUP to free up roster spot early in season, then come back week 6?

Since he's had an injury, he could conceivably be an "ouch, my finger" IR designation if they wanted. Maybe even a "designated to return" if they feel he's worth that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Since he's had an injury, he could conceivably be an "ouch, my finger" IR designation if they wanted. Maybe even a "designated to return" if they feel he's worth that.

He's still on the PUP. It's different than IR. If he starts the season on the PUP he can be brought back in 6 weeks. In the meantime he wouldn't count against the 53 - not even on Day 1. Nor does he count against the 2 designated to return spots on the IR. I think it's a huge win for roster flexibility.

With Armah I think we can keep only 2 TE on 53 with 1 on PS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...