Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This One Was on the Defense


Jimmy

Recommended Posts

No pressure on matt Ryan today. No sacks and the poo stain ran for 2 TDs. We got gashed in the running game giving up the 1st 100 yard rusher in 22 games. Missed tackles galore. 

Sure there were drops by the WRs on offense but Cam still threw for 71%. 

Butler, Mayo, Munnerlyn, Adams...poo the bed today.

Addison, Peppers, Horton, KK...where were you?

Luke...4 missed tackles that i know of but damn you can only ask so much from one guy

Shitty performance by the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.

Mayo, Butler, Addison, & Horton all had pretty bad days and were a big part of run d issues.  

With Mayo next to Luke, we lose TD's sideline to sideline speed and Adams has to come up more to attack the runner.  Problem is that he's slow as sh*t.  

We were slow and not generating pressure..even with a blitz.  Pass rush is lacking.  Pepp can't go for a whole game and Addison is not ideal against the run.  Horton is average. They all disguise eachother's weaknesses in rotation but got rocked today.  Maybe we should get Cox or Obada in there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

When you DROP nine passes, one going for an interception that proved to cost us the game, you put your defense on thei field too much.  They gashed us on Thomas Davis' side.   So blame illegal supplements.

I'll grant that was bad, but it's not like the defense waited until the third quarter before they started giving up big plays.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

When you DROP nine passes, one going for an interception that proved to cost us the game, you put your defense on thei field too much.  They gashed us on Thomas Davis' side.   So blame illegal supplements.

One interception never costs you the game...the overall performance of the defense cost us the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's absolutely on the D. Yeah, we had some dropped balls, but that pales in comparison to mistake after mistake after mistake on D. They gashed us on the ground, they shredded us through the air. They did whatever they wanted. It's a testament to the grit shown by the offense that we were even remotely competitive today. The D tried to get us blown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

When you DROP nine passes, one going for an interception that proved to cost us the game, you put your defense on thei field too much.  They gashed us on Thomas Davis' side.

This. I put it equally on defense and drops by multiple players. 

Actually at the end of the game the defense did what they needed to do and stopped them to give us a chance to win at the end. And we were one DJ Moore circus catch and 2 point coversion away from winning . 

I personally think the defense had a fluke game. We have 2 very winnable games coming up at home after this one and then TD coming back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...