Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess what grade PFF gave Cam?


TN05

Recommended Posts

Seems fair in all honesty.  The entire offense was bad save for a few plays through the first 3 quarters, even though Cam was responsible for pretty much all the offense we were able to eek out.  Then Cam played at like a 99.9% in the fourth.

So if you average Cam being about 65 (slightly above average for 3 quarters) and 100 for the fourth, you basically end up with ~74.

Anyway, I don't have a clue how they do their math but it seems reasonably representative of the overall body of work for Cam yesterday.

In the end, he was unbelievably clutch in the 4th and got the win.  A 100 in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are QBs throwing 350+ yards and 3+ TDs regularly. Our offense is tepid compared to some of these 2018 stick-moving machines.

I don't think clutch offense and carrying an offense are factored into PFF, which is how you get the grade above. It's not meant to be subjective like you apparently want it to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam goes 25/39 (64%), 269 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT . . . and rushes 7 times for 49 yards . . . and wins?  On the road?  Against the champs?

I get you don't want subjective, I respect that.  But it should definitely take winning and losing into account.  There's nothing subjective there.  Same with being on the road vs at home.

This is exactly the Cam we - and all the experts - wanted to see for years.  Limited mistakes.  Good completion percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Cam goes 25/39 (64%), 269 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT . . . and rushes 7 times for 49 yards . . . and wins?  On the road?  Against the champs?

I get you don't want subjective, I respect that.  But it should definitely take winning and losing into account.  There's nothing subjective there.  Same with being on the road vs at home.

This is exactly the Cam we - and all the experts - wanted to see for years.  Limited mistakes.  Good completion percentage.

No worries, winning is the key.  He get's an A from me.  We won, solid stats.  Let the trolls quibble over the other 3 quarters.  Coaches finally adjusted, Cam got into a good rhythm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...