Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our WRs numbers suck.


FugAllY'all

Recommended Posts

Seriously, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, what the hell is that? Half the time I can't tell the who the fug has the ball until the announcer says it, and they get it wrong a lot of the time! The only one that sticks out is Funchess, can we please get the others to wear something in the 80s? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not gonna lie, I hate this new school poo with those numbers, I'm used to 80s from way back when I was a little kid, that being said, our WRs all have different play styles and if you can't tell by watching, you haven't paid enough attention to them lol only one who I can't make out right away is Wright

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet all he catches are 1st downs and touchdowns.

TD doesn’t count as 1st down in these stats I assume so that’s 27 out of 29 receptions being a 1st or TD. Actually pretty damn good... I mean that’s the role we use him in so why would anyone expect any different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • On offense, QB and RB are a thing. QB needs to improve a fair amount, and the RBs have me unsure if they can match last year’s  level. Brooks being the big mystery. It seems like they think he is good to go, they didn’t do that much to ad insurance.    You have to think the defense will be better. We are young in a lot of places and can hope for some growth from a few guys, as the season progresses.    I think other teams in our division helped themselves too though. Every single one of them picked in front of us for three days and took players we might have taken over who was there for us.  
    • ??? Trevin is a lot of things, but slow is not one of them.
    • I'm holding out hope for Wallace and I feel like Dan wants this LB to hit. I still feel like Edgerrin Cooper was "their guy" and he got sniped from the FO. They also chose Wallace over Payton Wilson, so I think there's some ego there from the former LB. I also think Wallace has had some pretty mid partners the past two years. Josey, Rozeboom, and a bunch of PS/journeymen haven't helped his case.  We probably thought he could be "the guy" at ILB but he's shown that's not the case. Now the question is, can he be a "Robin" to Lloyd's "Batman".  As for Cherillus, I like him as a depth guy and have never thought of him as a starter. He flashed a number of times last year. Bam Martin-Scott is another depth/PS guy that we drafted with the hopes he could step up given the opportunity. He's the exact same build, 2 years younger than Cherelus and produced similar stats last year.  Iron sharpens iron. Let's go gents....time to step up or show yourself out. 
×
×
  • Create New...