Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's not forget, Tampa Bay has the #1 offense in the league


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

If you thought we would blow them out you were sadly mistaken. There is a reason that they have the #1 ranking. Thankfully, their defense is 29th which is why they are not a playoff team.

The Panthers look very much like the 2015 Panthers currently, which was full of nail biters and lost leads.

 

Let's go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are overreacting.  We were up by 28, gonna win by 14, and quite frankly the game was never close.  Yeah, they got within 7, but who actually thought we were gonna lose? 

It's not a big deal IMO and last week against the Ravens showed we know how to keep the foot on the gas when we really need to against a quality defense.  We pounded the Bucs.  It was never a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not trying to hear that excuse

I got a L against Steelers if we play the soft zone bullshit. We play physical vs Ravens, good things happen. We come out physical vs Bucs, good things happen. We revert back, bad things happen

If we don't play physical all game long vs Steelers count it up as a L. Hopefully Saints lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, beastson said:

Definitely not trying to hear that excuse

I got a L against Steelers if we play the soft zone bullshit. We play physical vs Ravens, good things happen. We come out physical vs Bucs, good things happen. We revert back, bad things happen

If we don't play physical all game long vs Steelers count it up as a L. Hopefully Saints lose.

Dude we only did that cause we were up by 20+.  If we're up by 20+ against the Steelers, I seriously doubt we lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone saying we took our foot off on offense is dead wrong, Tampa kept the ball most of the 3rd quarter and we had a couple of missed plays. Offense made plays when it mattered without the whizbang plays, which is even more important. This was an excellent win against a desperate divisional rival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...