Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hate to say it but Aints will win the Super Bowl


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lumps said:

Brees can literally make anyone a star, he doesn’t have weapons as much as the Saints simply have Brees

the oline is playing great but brees’ play style isn’t exactly hard to block for (won’t ever run, quick release etc)

A huge part of their success is their dominant running game and a huge part of that dominant running game is their OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

A huge part of their success is their dominant running game and a huge part of that dominant running game is their OL.

Something sadly, our GM's recently have neglected besides Moton. :(

Oh well, at least our Defense is still good. Oh wait...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A huge part of their success is their dominant running game and a huge part of that dominant running game is their OL.

Was more pointing out their pass protection, but will agree their rush blocking is incredible. But that’s not really the Oline...that’s the whole team being pretty damn good blockers.

The Panther’s oline is 11th(?) in the league and also is suppose to be great at rush blocking as we are second in the league. But breaking it down we have some players who can’t block, like CMC, but then again when your play design is for him to face a 300 lb DT, not sure who’s to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...