Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith Reports No Changes Expected With Panthers Head Coaching Job


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I’ve been a Panthers fan since 1996. I have cheered for losses exactly zero times. 

Except for now when you want Rivera gone so bad. I would rather win.  Rivera is not to blame for everything folks on this board are pinning on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HornetsSting said:

See, you and everyone else just want a scape goat. In what universe does Hurney need to be fired over Rivera?

Hurney's  free agency (Key contributors in BOLD, Injured Reserve in italics) :

FS Reid and Searcy (IR), CB Cockrell (IR, after Breeland fell through), WR Wright and Smith, OL Sirles (IR), NT Poe, DE Peppers, K Gano.

I am not a Hurney fan after trading first rounders to save his job before and drafting Clausen after 2 teams (KC and Minn) that desperately needed QBs passed on Clausen in that draft in both the first and the second round.  Then Armanti Edwards, then Kevin Norwood--terrible.  But he did OK in free agency with what he had.  I give him a B-.  Best signing (Reid); Easiest signing (Peppers); and best value (Wright).

Hurney's draft: Moore was a great pick and not an easy one.  Ridley was the consensus #1 WR most of the year, but Moore gives us a dazzling rookie and future NFL star.  Jackson in the second round has proven to be a great pick as well--where would we be without him?  Hurney historically does well in the first and lays an egg in the second.  He did not this time.  Gaulden was declared "developmental" when we drafted him, so the jury is still out-I have seen little to establish confidence in him, but I can wait.  Who did not like Thomas in the fourth?  I think we have something in him and his time to shine could be 2019.  I still do not get the Haynes pick.  I thought we might go after OL depth here, but we did not know at the time that Hall would be so terrible (I thought so when we drafted him, benefiting from playing opposite Garrett).  Still, Haynes cannot play 4-3 DE--maybe a situational pass rusher?  Not smart if you ask me today.  Carter and Smith proved to be solid special teamers and have some potential.  Norton sucked in preseason and will never play for us, even though he has a practice squad spot.

I give this draft a B.  We found 2 starters for this season and possibly 2 starters (Thomas and Gaulden) for 2019. 

So does Hurney deserve to be fired?  You could argue this--he does not deserve to be fired for what he does, he deserves to be fired for what he does not do.  Good point.  He tends to neglect some positions (historically) and we shall see how he does when the pressure is on.

I still say that Rivera will be fired at the end of this season if we go 1-3 the rest of the way--he might get fired if we finish 8-8.   If New Orleans sits their starters week 17, RR could get that victory that makes him seem respectable (9-7).  Give Tepper some time--he will get tired of RR and his game management, lack of adjustments, etc. and realize that Cam and Luke are the only reason he has his job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

I’ve personally seen enough, just too many bad decisions in crucial moments and his roster evaluations are questionable. Add in that this defense hasn’t adjusted to the new rules and our division, and I grow tired of trotting out 30+ Year old players in the secondary 

-I have to think that Tepper wants to form this team into his own image.  Keeping RR and Hurney is JR's image.  You also have to think that there are people Tepper knows who he'd like to see here.  As for the Norv/Rivera combo, I recall that several years ago, when their roles were reversed, that San Diego had a bad record and struggled to enter the playoffs through the back door when they had the #1 offense and the #1 defense in the NFL--how does that happen?

I think Black Monday is the day Rivera gets his packing papers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Sasquatch said:

Except for now when you want Rivera gone so bad. I would rather win.  Rivera is not to blame for everything folks on this board are pinning on him.

Of course he is not the blame for everything, but his portion are repeat offenders. In the real world those costly mistakes get you fired bc your not being proactive but reactive and kissing money not showing signs of growth. Eventually being stagnant kills your business and this is what has happen to the panthers. I think he is an average coach. I believe we could do better, we have to at least try. He has had time to correct his issues and its the same thing yr after yr. We can not get probowlers at every position to win a SB. This team has to play at an elite level every game to keep Ron' decision making coming into play. So tell me what is his job?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I love how you’re telling me what I think. 

That’s not how it works. 

I wasn't telling you what to think. Just reading your inputs. 

Right below your name, you have "Wanted Head Coach...." , then you post  basically that 8 straight losses will open the spot. I can add,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Jarrod, You make a good point, and you are not really saying that he will do differently than the fans want.  Tepper is rich because he thinks differently than we do.

Tepper is an icon as a hedge fund manager.  Hedge fund managers make sophisticated and risky decisions  based on data analysis, and market projections.  These seem to be the skills that will be at play.  Is Rivera capable of delivering long-term positive returns for this franchise and does he give us the best opportunity to win?  I say, no, but what I say does not matter.

The less emotion that goes into decisions, the better.  So your point is spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Ron has definitely lost the locker room. Guys don’t want to play for him anymore and it will be more apparent this afternoon. Personally I think everything is still on the table as far as his job. He’s gone if we lose out. 

I think he is gone if we go .500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...