Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A complete list of Panthers from the Super Bowl team guaranteed to be here next year


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

- Cam

- Luke

- Trai Turner

- Olsen (and before you say he's not guaranteed, his cap hit would be huge if he were to be cut)

- Addison

- KK Short

- Gano

- JJ Jansen

And that's it, that's the entire list. There are some like Daryl Williams and Wes Horton that are free agents that may return, but they're not guaranteed. 

Things change very quickly in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

As long as Cam and Luke are on the list we are good. Just have to build around them. Most of the people that were on the team that aren't anymore were either non-factors or out of the league now. 

Cam's Shoulder wants to have a few words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Why is this funny it’s already happened before. Not that I agree with the decision to keep Gano over Butker but it’s def possible he’s not the kicker next season 

Its funny in 2 ways:

1. It has already been tried and failed.

2. If it is tried again and succeeds, it will have been 2 years and millions of dollars too late.

So, at least to me, very much worth an ironic laugh.

Charlton-Heston-Crazy-laughing.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I'd like to add a monster TE as much as anyone else but ultimately what use will that serve with a QB who had 54 passing yards in 4 quarters at one point last season? Defense defense defense.
    • Personally I think he's a nightmare to cover I think linebackers generally aren't fast enough to keep up with him in coverage and cornerbacks don't have the strength to tackle him one-on-one in physically bring them down which would normally lead to a broken tackle or a nasty stiff arm or just bully ball play sure you could find a receiver with comparable speed like Cooper but he's faster than Cooper sure you can find a wide receiver that is the same size but he's probably More powerful than them and a better blocker.  The size speed athleticism package that he is in is completely unique it's easier to say I'd rather have just a big blocker because we've never seen this type of profile before I'm a risk taker I think you would be God blessed if this was there at 19 I think if you can get a guy that's a tight end who immediately becomes the fastest guy on your offense and at the same time that third wide receiver that can stretch and burn defenses over the top that's the perfect what the Panthers need type weapon.
    • I think you're under selling Sadiq. They are two different players in terms of how they win. Loveland is 2 inches taller maybe 5-6 pounds heavier. Comparing his speed to sadiq.. well your comparing a 4.7 guy to a 4.3 guy I'm seeing a guy that can take a bubble screen from the tight end position and turn it into a house call. I'm not saying the guy is a certified home run pick but I don't think there's really a president's for a comparison for this kind of athlete. It's easy to say this doesn't look like Warren or Loveland because we haven't seen guys that fit this profile The closest you might be able to get is Vernon Davis.  He's not as sure far as those guys were but at 19 I think almost everybody is going to have some warts and he's a lottery ticket of could be top 10 in the draft player or could fail I am more of a risk taker I think he fits the athletic profile that could be a homerun, like I said he's almost 40 lb bigger than Cooper and like 4-5 in taller than Cooper so and he's faster. So whatever you think Cooper gives you I think he does that and more. If you want to go with one of the office alignment I can understand that as well but for value as a receiving threat I don't think there's a bigger value at number 19.
×
×
  • Create New...