Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFNZ panthers interviews at superbowl Radio row (Rivera, Olsen, Adams, CMC)


ncfan

Recommended Posts

Olsen one was pretty good

Guys is going to make one helluva broadcaster when he retires

 

 

Seemed Real confident he is going to return.  Said every one he has spoke to including doctors and people who have had this same surgery he just had said positive things

 

Said this surgery is more in depth with a lot longer recovery time but all the results turn out Really well.

Mentioned players normally dont go right for that surgery because the longer rehab process.

 

Seemed confident is this team.  Said this was the worst disaster pf a season pf a team he has been a part of, yet we were only 2 games out of the playoffs and had several close winnable gane that a few missed plays and we couldve been in the playoffs (specifically mentioned Cleveland, Detroit, Seattle, and first Saints game)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Olsen returns next year, I hope Norv cooks up some stuff similar to what we did with Olsen and Shockey under Chud. Ian Thomas is too good to simply go back to the bench and be forgotten.

And we shall call it the Gregorian debate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ron said the same thing when he was initially hired and yet we're still waiting.

When he got here he talked a lot about being aggressive, but he didn't talk about using the 3-4 they way he is now. 

By the way he is talking, this is happening.  I don't know if you listened to the interview, but he talked about looking at plays that really worked for us this year and seeing how effective we were when in a 30 front.  He also talked a lot about how being able to go 3-4 or 4-3 without having to change personnel will really make it difficult for opponents to know what we are doing and how to attack it.

He seems excited about the move.  I got the impression that we will be in a 3-4 base, with the ability to switch to a 4-3 depending on the situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Woodie said:

When he got here he talked a lot about being aggressive, but he didn't talk about using the 3-4 they way he is now. 

By the way he is talking, this is happening.  I don't know if you listened to the interview, but he talked about looking at plays that really worked for us this year and seeing how effective we were when in a 30 front.  He also talked a lot about how being able to go 3-4 or 4-3 without having to change personnel will really make it difficult for opponents to know what we are doing and how to attack it.

He seems excited about the move.  I got the impression that we will be in a 3-4 base, with the ability to switch to a 4-3 depending on the situation.  

He definitely talked about running a 4-3/3-4 hybrid when he was hired. I also remember how excited I was about how he talked about using Shaq when he was drafted allowing us to stay in our base D more often and being more unpredictable, etc. I don't think our percentage of nickel vs. base fronts changed a bit. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ron said the same thing when he was initially hired and yet we're still waiting.

Might be we didn't do it before because his coordinators like McDermott we're already entrenched in the 4-3 and felt more confident in that scheme. Now that Ron is taking over the play calling and based on their success using a hybrid package at times, and his familiarity running a 3-4 under Norv, they are moving in that direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He definitely talked about running a 4-3/3-4 hybrid when he was hired. I also remember how excited I was about how he talked about using Shaq when he was drafted allowing us to stay in our base D more often and being more unpredictable, etc. I don't think our percentage of nickel vs. base fronts changed a bit. 

 

  That poor concept was directly against where the league was going. There are hardly any 4-3/3-4 teams. You HAVE to play nickel. Last thing we need is less “athleticism” no matter what we run. The same “80s mentality” that gives us Safeties that are just small LBs with no coverage skills. 

 Everyone played 11 personnel. Even more now. In what world did they believe there were NFL slot WRs that he was going to cover? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He definitely talked about running a 4-3/3-4 hybrid when he was hired. I also remember how excited I was about how he talked about using Shaq when he was drafted allowing us to stay in our base D more often and being more unpredictable, etc. I don't think our percentage of nickel vs. base fronts changed a bit. 

 

I think that Shaq has been a big disappointment in that regard moreso than Rivera scrapped the idea.  And yeah our use of nickel has gone up from what I have seen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...