Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Season ticket renewal letter


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

Looks like this has been in the works for a while, article from last summer:

https://sports.cbslocal.com/2018/06/18/nfl-stadiums-ticketmaster-fully-digital-ticket-systems-2018-season/

In the article they do mention a "paper option"....

The digital product/system is going to be provided by -- surprise surprise -- TicketMaster.  The TM rep suggests the main driver for the product is to eliminate fraud but I believe that to be a red herring....

....by my estimation this is a two-fold effort to (i) mine data, and (ii) make it harder (if not impossible) to re-sell a ticket w/o the team & TM knowing about it, and possibly participating in the revenue stream if the ticket is sold for above face value.

Possibly I am wrong but that's my initial take on the situation.  TM has a long track record for screwing the fan, I'm suspicious of anything they are involved in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GeorgeHanson said:

Looks like this has been in the works for a while, article from last summer:  https://sports.cbslocal.com/2018/06/18/nfl-stadiums-ticketmaster-fully-digital-ticket-systems-2018-season/

In the article they do mention a "paper option"....

The digital product/system is going to be provided by -- surprise surprise -- TicketMaster.  The TM rep suggests the main driver for the product is to eliminate fraud but I believe that to be a red herring....

....this is a two-fold effort to (i) mine data, and make it harder to re-sell a ticket w/o the team & TM knowing about it, and possibly participating in the revenue stream if the ticket is sold for above face value.

Possibly I am wrong but that's my initial take on the situation.  TM has a long track record for screwing the fan, I'm suspicious of anything they are involved in.

You're not wrong on your last two points, but ticket fraud is definitely not a red herring. There are a lot of people who get scammed because they don't know what to look for. I've received tickets from a scalper that looked legit as hell, but weren't. It's actually happened a couple of times over the year. Sometimes, I've been able to get in, others not. If you're a family of four who never really get to go to games, don't know what to look for, and drop several hundred bucks to make little Tommy and the rest of the family happy, it can be the most disheartening thing to get scammed. I would tend to think that this happens every Sunday multiple times.

I think digital tickets are a great idea. Albeit, now that I have PSLs, I'll probably go with the paper option because I keep a ticket from every game I attend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, GeorgeHanson said:

Looks like this has been in the works for a while, article from last summer:

https://sports.cbslocal.com/2018/06/18/nfl-stadiums-ticketmaster-fully-digital-ticket-systems-2018-season/

In the article they do mention a "paper option"....

The digital product/system is going to be provided by -- surprise surprise -- TicketMaster.  The TM rep suggests the main driver for the product is to eliminate fraud but I believe that to be a red herring....

....by my estimation this is a two-fold effort to (i) mine data, and make it harder (if not impossible) to re-sell a ticket w/o the team & TM knowing about it, and possibly participating in the revenue stream if the ticket is sold for above face value.

Possibly I am wrong but that's my initial take on the situation.  TM has a long track record for screwing the fan, I'm suspicious of anything they are involved in.

Correct.  TM wants to cut out private scalping so they can do it themselves. 

Ticketmaster Verified is nothing more than a TM sponsored scalping site.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Arroz con Panther said:

You're not wrong on your last two points, but ticket fraud is definitely not a red herring. There are a lot of people who get scammed because they don't know what to look for. I've received tickets from a scalper that looked legit as hell, but weren't. It's actually happened a couple of times over the year. Sometimes, I've been able to get in, others not. If you're a family of four who never really get to go to games, don't know what to look for, and drop several hundred bucks to make little Tommy and the rest of the family happy, it can be the most disheartening thing to get scammed. I would tend to think that this happens every Sunday multiple times.

I think digital tickets are a great idea. Albeit, now that I have PSLs, I'll probably go with the paper option because I keep a ticket from every game I attend.

Oh I completely agree that fraud exists, bigtime.  I've seen certain instances where the venue confiscated fakes equal to almost 10% of the house at certain major concerts that were held in smaller theater types venues (2000 to 3000 seats).

That said, this has been the case for decades and TM never did anything to help the situation (nor did the police).

TM isn't putting this new system in to help with fraud, they are putting it in because it's a big money maker for them.....fewer fakes is simply a byproduct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything of value printed on paper, including checks, is pretty much extinct because of scammers.  Digital tickets seems like a logical change to eliminate or greatly reduce the amount of people scammed by fake tickets.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GeorgeHanson said:

...by my estimation this is a two-fold effort to (i) mine data, and (ii) make it harder (if not impossible) to re-sell a ticket w/o the team & TM knowing about it, and possibly participating in the revenue stream if the ticket is sold for above face value.

 

This I had not thought about... BUT what now pops in my head is how are people going to sell tickets outside the stadium??   PSL owners and the Scalpers are going to have to do a transfer via the App outside the stadium I guess.  I think this will hurt the walk up to the stadium on gameday crowd.  I know for me, we have 2 psl's and lots of times will scalp for two extra's outside for other family members and friends.  Not sure I will do that anymore, if cant deal with an actual ticket that way.   Plus like you said, now if I want to do that have to go through TicketExchange or other and with that comes all the fees, etc.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly don't think this has much to do with ticket scammers.  You'll still be able to print from your Panthers PSL account as i understand it (edit: maybe not, just sent an email asking).  More to do with cutting the cost of printing and shipping the booklets IMO.

I will miss the paper ticket, like to to keep them, have every one from every game I've attended since getting my PSL's in 1998.  I am a curmudgeon that hates change (half joking) but i'll give them a shot. 

If it makes it better then great, i'll just keep the program (until they go to digital).  I am a bit skeptical, they are going to have to change/improve the stadium entry process.  I can see this scenario repeated over and over and over: drunk couple in front holding up the line because they can't get the ticket to pull up on their phone and i miss the first quarter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...